Rates of serious infection after changes in regimens for medical abortion
- PMID: 19587339
- PMCID: PMC3568698
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809146
Rates of serious infection after changes in regimens for medical abortion
Abstract
Background: From 2001 through March 2006, Planned Parenthood health centers throughout the United States provided medical abortion (abortion by means of medication) principally by a regimen of oral mifepristone followed 24 to 48 hours later by vaginal misoprostol. In response to concern about serious infections, in early 2006 Planned Parenthood changed the route of misoprostol administration from vaginal to buccal and required either routine provision of antibiotics or universal screening and treatment for chlamydia; in July 2007, Planned Parenthood began requiring routine treatment with antibiotics for all medical abortions.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis assessing the rates of serious infection after medical abortion during a time when misoprostol was administered vaginally (through March 2006), as compared with rates after a change to buccal administration of misoprostol and after initiation of additional infection-reduction measures.
Results: Rates of serious infection dropped significantly after the joint change to buccal misoprostol from vaginal misoprostol and to either testing for sexually transmitted infection or routine provision of antibiotics as part of the medical abortion regimen. The rate declined 73%, from 0.93 per 1000 abortions to 0.25 per 1000 (absolute reduction, 0.67 per 1000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.94; P<0.001). The subsequent change to routine provision of antibiotics led to a further significant reduction in the rate of serious infection - a 76% decline, from 0.25 per 1000 abortions to 0.06 per 1000 (absolute reduction, 0.19 per 1000; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.34; P=0.03).
Conclusions: The rate of serious infection after medical abortion declined by 93% after a change from vaginal to buccal administration of misoprostol combined with routine administration of antibiotics.
2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Conflict of interest statement
No other conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Comment in
-
Rates of serious infection after medical abortion.N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 8;361(15):1511-2; author reply 1512. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc091589. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19812412 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Reduction in infection-related mortality since modifications in the regimen of medical abortion.Contraception. 2014 Mar;89(3):193-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.020. Epub 2013 Dec 11. Contraception. 2014. PMID: 24405798 Free PMC article.
-
Severity of infection following the introduction of new infection control measures for medical abortion.Contraception. 2011 Apr;83(4):330-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.08.022. Epub 2010 Oct 8. Contraception. 2011. PMID: 21397090 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of medical abortion with mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 59 gestational days.Contraception. 2009 Sep;80(3):282-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 2. Contraception. 2009. PMID: 19698822 Free PMC article.
-
[Misoprostol: off-label use in the first trimester of pregnancy (spontaneous abortion, and voluntary medical termination of pregnancy)].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014 Feb;43(2):123-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.11.007. Epub 2014 Jan 13. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014. PMID: 24433988 Review. French.
-
The pharmacokinetics and different regimens of misoprostol in early first-trimester medical abortion.Contraception. 2006 Jul;74(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.005. Epub 2006 Apr 27. Contraception. 2006. PMID: 16781256 Review.
Cited by
-
Medication to Manage Abortion and Miscarriage.J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2398-2405. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05836-9. Epub 2020 May 14. J Gen Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32410127 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 9;3(3):CD013181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013181.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32150279 Free PMC article.
-
Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for uterine evacuation after early pregnancy failure: study protocol for a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled comparison (Triple M Trial).BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2497-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 31775677 Free PMC article.
-
First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada.PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0186487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186487. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 29023594 Free PMC article.
-
Neither vaginal nor buccal administration of 800 μg misoprostol alters mucosal and systemic immune activation or the cervicovaginal microbiome: a pilot study.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016 Dec;21(6):436-442. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1229765. Epub 2016 Sep 16. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016. PMID: 27636701 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Sawaya GF, Grady D, Kerlikowske K, Grimes DA. Antibiotics at the time of induced abortion: the case for universal prophylaxis based on a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:884–890. - PubMed
-
- Spitz IM, Bardin CW, Benton L, Robbins A. Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1241–1227. - PubMed
-
- Hausknecht R. Mifepristone and misoprostol for early medical abortion: 18 months experience in the United States. Contraception. 2003;67:463–465. - PubMed
-
- Shannon C, Brothers LP, Philip NM, Winikoff B. Infection after medical abortion: a review of the literature. Contraception. 2004;70:183–190. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical