Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery
- PMID: 19605828
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900708
Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery
Abstract
Background: Vein-graft harvesting with the use of endoscopy (endoscopic harvesting) is a technique that is widely used to reduce postoperative wound complications after coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), but the long-term effects on the rate of vein-graft failure and on clinical outcomes are unknown.
Methods: We studied the outcomes in patients who underwent endoscopic harvesting (1753 patients) as compared with those who underwent graft harvesting under direct vision, termed open harvesting (1247 patients), in a secondary analysis of 3000 patients undergoing CABG. The method of graft harvesting was determined by the surgeon. Vein-graft failure was defined as stenosis of at least 75% of the diameter of the graft on angiography 12 to 18 months after surgery (data were available in an angiographic subgroup of 1817 patients and 4290 grafts). Clinical outcomes included death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Generalized estimating equations were used to adjust for baseline covariates associated with vein-graft failure and to account for the potential correlation between grafts within a patient. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was used to assess long-term clinical outcomes.
Results: The baseline characteristics were similar between patients who underwent endoscopic harvesting and those who underwent open harvesting. Patients who underwent endoscopic harvesting had higher rates of vein-graft failure at 12 to 18 months than patients who underwent open harvesting (46.7% vs. 38.0%, P<0.001). At 3 years, endoscopic harvesting was also associated with higher rates of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization (20.2% vs. 17.4%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.47; P=0.04), death or myocardial infarction (9.3% vs. 7.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.77; P=0.01), and death (7.4% vs. 5.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.04; P=0.005).
Conclusions: Endoscopic vein-graft harvesting is independently associated with vein-graft failure and adverse clinical outcomes. Randomized clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this harvesting technique.
2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting.N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1907; author reply 1909-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc091645. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19890137 No abstract available.
-
Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting.N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1908; author reply 1909-10. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19911437 No abstract available.
-
Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting.N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1907-8; author reply 1909-10. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19911452 No abstract available.
-
Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting.N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1908-9; author reply 1909-10. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19911453 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Mar;129(3):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.054. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005. PMID: 15746730 Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of preoperative renal dysfunction on one-year bypass graft patency and two-year outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Nov;136(5):1149-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.02.085. Epub 2008 Aug 27. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 19026795
-
Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;89(2):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.061. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20103309
-
Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts.Circulation. 2004 May 4;109(17):2086-91. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127570.20508.5C. Circulation. 2004. PMID: 15123539 Review.
-
Is it safe to perform endoscopic vein harvest?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;10(4):625-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.227090. Epub 2010 Jan 25. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20100708 Review.
Cited by
-
Mid-term outcomes of endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective cohort study.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jun 27;19(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02930-5. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 38926738 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of perivascular tissue preservation on 5-year patency of saphenous vein composite grafts.Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 May 2;38(5):ivae069. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae069. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 38637939 Free PMC article.
-
Consensus statement-graft treatment in cardiovascular bypass graft surgery.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 27;11:1285685. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1285685. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 38476377 Free PMC article.
-
Techniques and Technologies to Improve Vein Graft Patency in Coronary Surgery.Med Sci (Basel). 2024 Jan 11;12(1):6. doi: 10.3390/medsci12010006. Med Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38249082 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Temporal Changes in the Surface Chemistry and Topography of Reactive Ion Plasma-Treated Poly(vinyl alcohol) Alter Endothelialization Potential.ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024 Jan 10;16(1):389-400. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c16759. Epub 2023 Dec 20. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024. PMID: 38117934 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical