A randomized trial of the traditional sitting position versus the hamstring stretch position for labor epidural needle placement

Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):532-4. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ac6c79.

Abstract

Background: Anecdotal and experimental evidence suggest that a sitting position with maximum knee extension, hip adduction, and forward lean (hamstring stretch position) may produce better reversal of the lumbar lordosis than a traditional sitting position.

Methods: In a randomized trial during initiation of epidural labor analgesia, we compared the traditional versus hamstring stretch positions. The primary outcome was the number of needle-bone contacts.

Results: The groups were equivalent with respect to the number of needle-bone contacts.

Conclusions: The hamstring stretch position is equivalent to the traditional sitting position in terms of the number of needle-bone contacts encountered when placing labor epidural needles.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anesthesia, Epidural* / adverse effects
  • Anesthesia, Obstetrical* / adverse effects
  • Body Mass Index
  • Bone and Bones
  • Epidural Space / anatomy & histology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Needles
  • Posture / physiology*
  • Pregnancy
  • Spine / physiology
  • Treatment Outcome