Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 1):1465-79.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00996.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13.

Impact of financial incentives for prenatal care on birth outcomes and spending

Affiliations

Impact of financial incentives for prenatal care on birth outcomes and spending

Meredith B Rosenthal et al. Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of offering US$100 each to patients and their obstetricians or midwives for timely and comprehensive prenatal care on low birth weight, neonatal intensive care admissions, and total pediatric health care spending in the first year of life.

Data sources/study setting: Claims and enrollment profiles of the predominantly low-income and Hispanic participants of a union-sponsored, health insurance plan from 1998 to 2001.

Study design: Panel data analysis of outcomes and spending for participants and nonparticipants using instrumental variables to account for selection bias. DATA COLLECTION/ABSTRACTION METHODS: Data provided were analyzed using t-tests and chi-squared tests to compare maternal characteristics and birth outcomes for incentive program participants and nonparticipants, with and without instrumental variables to address selection bias. Adjusted variables were analyzed using logistic regression models.

Principle findings: Participation in the incentive program was significantly associated with lower odds of neonatal intensive care unit admission (0.45; 95 percent CI, 0.23-0.88) and spending in the first year of life (estimated elasticity of -0.07; 95 percent CI, -0.12 to -0.01), but not low birth weight (0.53; 95 percent CI, 0.23-1.18).

Conclusion: The use of patient and physician incentives may be an effective mechanism for improving use of recommended prenatal care and associated outcomes, particularly among low-income women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Annual Trends in HPP Participation, Low Birthweight, and NICU Admissions

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Assessing the Role and Effectiveness of Prenatal Care: History, Challenges, and Directions for Future Research. Public Health Report. 2001;116(4):306–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes Board on Health Sciences Policy: Preterm Birth—Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
    1. Buntin MB, Zaslavsky AM. Too Much Ado about Two-Part Models and Transformation? Comparing Methods of Modeling Medicare Expenditures. Journal of Health Economics. 2004;23(3):525–42. - PubMed
    1. Conway KS, Deb P. Is Prenatal Care Really Ineffective? Or, Is the ‘Devil’ in the Distribution? Journal of Health Economics. 2005;24(3):489–513. - PubMed
    1. Currie J, Gruber J. Saving Babies: The Efficacy and Cost of Recent Expansions of Medicaid Eligibility for Pregnant Women. Journal of Political Economy. 1996;104(6):1263–96.

Publication types

MeSH terms