Hospital variation in time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest
- PMID: 19636027
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.196
Hospital variation in time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest
Abstract
Background: Delays to defibrillation are associated with worse survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest, but the degree to which hospitals vary in defibrillation response times and hospital predictors of delays remain unknown.
Methods: Using hierarchical models, we evaluated hospital variation in rates of delayed defibrillation (>2 minutes) and its impact on survival among 7479 adult inpatients with cardiac arrests at 200 hospitals within the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Results: Adjusted rates of delayed defibrillation varied substantially among hospitals (range, 2.4%-50.9%), with hospital-level effects accounting for a significant amount of the total variation in defibrillation delays after adjusting for patient factors. We found a 46% greater odds of patients with identical covariates getting delayed defibrillation at one randomly selected hospital compared with another. Among traditional hospital factors evaluated, however, only bed volume (reference category: <200 beds; 200-499 beds: odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.48-0.80]; >or=500 beds: OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.53-1.04]) and arrest location (reference category: intensive care unit; telemetry unit: OR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.65-2.22]; nonmonitored unit: OR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.61-2.24]) were associated with differences in rates of delayed defibrillation. Wide variation also existed in adjusted hospital rates of survival to discharge (range, 5.3%-49.6%), with higher survival among hospitals in the top-performing quartile for defibrillation time (compared with the bottom quartile: OR for top quartile, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.11-1.77]).
Conclusions: Rates of delayed defibrillation vary widely among hospitals but are largely unexplained by traditional hospital factors. Given its association with improved survival, future research is needed to better understand best practices in the delivery of defibrillation at top-performing hospitals.
Comment in
-
In a heartbeat: decreasing in-hospital time to defibrillation.Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jul 27;169(14):1260-1. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.178. Arch Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19636025 No abstract available.
-
It is time to get more accurate times to defibrillation.Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2163-4; author reply 2164. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.451. Arch Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 20008704 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest.N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):9-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706467. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18172170
-
Delayed time to defibrillation after intraoperative and periprocedural cardiac arrest.Anesthesiology. 2010 Oct;113(4):782-93. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181eaa74f. Anesthesiology. 2010. PMID: 20808215
-
Variability in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest depending on the hospital level of care.Resuscitation. 2007 Apr;73(1):73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.022. Epub 2007 Jan 23. Resuscitation. 2007. PMID: 17250948
-
If a patient arrests after cardiac surgery is it acceptable to delay cardiopulmonary resuscitation until you have attempted either defibrillation or pacing?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;7(5):878-85. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.182980. Epub 2008 Jun 10. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18544586 Review.
-
[In-hospital resuscitation--definitely better than in the field?].Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2011 Jul;46(7-8):476-85. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1284466. Epub 2011 Aug 3. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2011. PMID: 21815115 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Inhospital cardiac arrest - the crucial first 5 min: a simulation study.Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Sep 9;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00225-0. Adv Simul (Lond). 2022. PMID: 36085089 Free PMC article.
-
Timing errors and temporal uncertainty in clinical databases-A narrative review.Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 18;4:932599. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.932599. eCollection 2022. Front Digit Health. 2022. PMID: 36060541 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Manual and Mechanical Induced Peri-Resuscitation Injuries-Post-Mortem and Clinical Findings.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 22;19(16):10434. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610434. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36012068 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators for successful AED usage during in-situ simulated in-hospital cardiac arrest.Resusc Plus. 2022 Jun 2;10:100257. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100257. eCollection 2022 Jun. Resusc Plus. 2022. PMID: 35677834 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and 5-Year Survival Following in-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Open Access Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 16;13:553-560. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S341479. eCollection 2021. Open Access Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34938129 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
