Integrated FDG-PET-CT: its role in the assessment of bone and soft tissue tumors

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Jul;130(7):819-27. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0937-2. Epub 2009 Jul 28.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively, whether integrated 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D: -glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET-CT) is more accurate for determination musculoskeletal tumors compared with separate interpretation of CT and FDG-PET, because most of the current clinical data come from patients studied with PET.

Methods: Eighty patients with newly diagnosed musculoskeletal tumors underwent FDG-PET-CT. CT, FDG-PET, and FDG-PET-CT were interpreted separately to determine the performance of each imaging modality.

Results: Assuming that equivocal lesions are benign, performance of diagnostic tests was as follows: sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for CT alone was 81, 84, 83%, for PET 71, 82, 76, and for PET-CT 80, 83 and 86%. Assuming that equivocal lesions are malignant, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CT was 61, 100, 70%, for PET 69, 100, 79, and for PET-CT 69, 100 and 79%.

Conclusions: Combined FDG-PET-CT reliably differentiates soft tissue and bone tumors from benign lesions. The value of the information provided by FDG-PET-CT for planning surgical procedures must be evaluated in further studies.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bone Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Child
  • Female
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Muscle Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Positron-Emission Tomography*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiopharmaceuticals*
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18