Development, implementation, and public reporting of the HCAHPS survey
- PMID: 19638641
- DOI: 10.1177/1077558709341065
Development, implementation, and public reporting of the HCAHPS survey
Abstract
The authors describe the history and development of the CAHPS Hospital Survey (also known as HCAHPS) and its associated protocols. The randomized mode experiment, vendor training, and "dry runs" that set the stage for initial public reporting are described. The rapid linkage of HCAHPS data to annual payment updates ("pay for reporting") is noted, which in turn led to the participation of approximately 3,900 general acute care hospitals (about 90% of all such United States hospitals). The authors highlight the opportunities afforded by this publicly reported data on hospital inpatients' experiences and perceptions of care. These data, reported on www.hospitalcompare.hhs. gov, facilitate the national comparison of patients' perspectives of hospital care and can be used alone or in conjunction with other clinical and outcome measures. Potential benefits include increased transparency, improved consumer decision making, and increased incentives for the delivery of high-quality health care.
Similar articles
-
Patients' perception of hospital care in the United States.N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1921-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0804116. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18971493
-
Racial/ethnic differences in patients' perceptions of inpatient care using the HCAHPS survey.Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Feb;67(1):74-92. doi: 10.1177/1077558709341066. Epub 2009 Aug 3. Med Care Res Rev. 2010. PMID: 19652150
-
Do hospitals rank differently on HCAHPS for different patient subgroups?Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Feb;67(1):56-73. doi: 10.1177/1077558709339066. Epub 2009 Jul 15. Med Care Res Rev. 2010. PMID: 19605621
-
The public's perception of quality hospitals II: Implications for patient surveys.Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1992 Spring;37(1):13-35. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1992. PMID: 10116109 Review.
-
Effect of HCAHPS reporting on patient satisfaction with physician communication.J Hosp Med. 2016 Feb;11(2):105-10. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2490. Epub 2015 Sep 25. J Hosp Med. 2016. PMID: 26404621 Review.
Cited by
-
Top 100 most cited articles on Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREM): insights and perspectives.J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Sep 30;8(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00791-z. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024. PMID: 39348041 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Socioeconomic disadvantage and its impact on patient satisfaction at a multi-site radiation oncology center.Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 Sep 6;32:100276. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100276. eCollection 2024 Dec. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39309530 Free PMC article.
-
Community design of the Brooklyn Health Equity Index.Health Aff Sch. 2024 Sep 9;2(9):qxae112. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae112. eCollection 2024 Sep. Health Aff Sch. 2024. PMID: 39301412 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of patient satisfaction scores on physician clinical decision making: A possible factor driving utilization of opioid prescriptions, magnetic resonance imaging, and interventional spine procedures.Interv Pain Med. 2022 Feb 3;1(1):100012. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100012. eCollection 2022 Mar. Interv Pain Med. 2022. PMID: 39238821 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common.Am J Med Qual. 2024 Jul-Aug 01;39(4):188-196. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197. Epub 2024 Jul 8. Am J Med Qual. 2024. PMID: 38976453 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
