Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;8(4):457-64.
doi: 10.1007/s10689-009-9265-5. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer

Affiliations

Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer

Chantal Lammens et al. Fam Cancer. 2009.

Abstract

The use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for hereditary cancer is subject to on-going debate, particularly among professionals. This study evaluates the attitude towards PGD and attitude-associated characteristics of those concerned: family members with a hereditary cancer predisposition. Forty-eight Von Hippel-Lindau and 18 Li-Fraumeni Syndrome families were identified via the 9 family cancer clinics in the Netherlands. In total, 216 high risk family members and partners were approached, of whom 179 (83%) completed a self-report questionnaire. Of the high risk family members, 35% expressed a positive attitude towards PGD. Those with a current desire to have children were significantly more likely to have a positive attitude: 48% would consider the use of PGD. No other sociodemographic, medical or psychosocial variables were associated significantly with a positive attitude. The most frequently reported advantage of PGD is the avoidance of a possible pregnancy termination. Uncertainty about late effects was the most frequently reported disadvantage. These results indicate that approximately half of those contemplating a future pregnancy would consider the use of PGD. The actual uptake, however, is expected to be lower. There is no indication that psychosocial factors affect interest in PGD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Textbox 1
Textbox 1
Explanation of PGD towards study participants

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pasacreta JV. Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: an integrative review. Cancer Invest. 2003;21:588–623. doi: 10.1081/CNV-120022380. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, et al. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990;344:768–770. doi: 10.1038/344768a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sermon K, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Lancet. 2004;363:1633–1641. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16209-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Offit K, Kohut K, Clagett B, et al. Cancer genetic testing and assisted reproduction. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4775–4782. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.6100. - DOI - PubMed
    1. (2006) Ethics of preimplantations genetic diagnosis for cancer. Lancet Oncol 7:611. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70768-9 - PubMed

Publication types