National patterns in antidepressant medication treatment
- PMID: 19652124
- DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.81
National patterns in antidepressant medication treatment
Abstract
Context: Antidepressants have recently become the most commonly prescribed class of medications in the United States.
Objective: To compare sociodemographic and clinical patterns of antidepressant medication treatment in the United States between 1996 and 2005.
Design: Analysis of antidepressant use data from the 1996 (n = 18 993) and 2005 (n = 28 445) Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys.
Setting: Households in the United States.
Participants: Respondents aged 6 years or older who reported receiving at least 1 antidepressant prescription during that calendar year.
Main outcome measures: Rate of antidepressant use and adjusted rate ratios (ARRs) of year effect on rate of antidepressant use adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, annual family income, self-perceived mental health, and insurance status.
Results: The rate of antidepressant treatment increased from 5.84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.47-6.23) in 1996 to 10.12% (9.58-10.69) in 2005 (ARR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.55-1.81), or from 13.3 to 27.0 million persons. Significant increases in antidepressant use were evident across all sociodemographic groups examined, except African Americans (ARR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89-1.44), who had comparatively low rates of use in both years (1996, 3.61%; 2005, 4.51%). Although antidepressant treatment increased for Hispanics (ARR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.60-1.90), it remained comparatively low (1996, 3.72%; 2005, 5.21%). Among antidepressant users, the percentage of patients treated for depression did not significantly change (1996, 26.25% vs 2005, 26.85%; ARR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.07), although the percentage of patients receiving antipsychotic medications (5.46% vs 8.86%; ARR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.31-2.38) increased and those undergoing psychotherapy declined (31.50% vs 19.87%; ARR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.72).
Conclusions: From 1996 to 2005, there was a marked and broad expansion in antidepressant treatment in the United States, with persisting low rates of treatment among racial/ethnic minorities. During this period, individuals treated with antidepressants became more likely to also receive treatment with antipsychotic medications and less likely to undergo psychotherapy.
Comment in
-
Increased antidepressant and antipsychotic use in the USA between 1996 and 2005.Evid Based Ment Health. 2010 May;13(2):62. doi: 10.1136/ebmh.13.2.62. Evid Based Ment Health. 2010. PMID: 21856625 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Trends in Treatment and Spending for Patients Receiving Outpatient Treatment of Depression in the United States, 1998-2015.JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 1;76(8):810-817. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0633. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31017627 Free PMC article.
-
Outpatient prescriptions for atypical antipsychotics for African Americans, Hispanics, and whites in the United States.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):121-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.121. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003. PMID: 12578429
-
A decline in depression treatment following FDA antidepressant warnings largely explains racial/ethnic disparities in prescription fills.Depress Anxiety. 2017 Dec;34(12):1147-1156. doi: 10.1002/da.22681. Epub 2017 Sep 29. Depress Anxiety. 2017. PMID: 28962069 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of antipsychotic medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;48(12):1861-72. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0753-4. Epub 2013 Aug 14. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23942793 Review.
-
Comparison of the Total Number of People in the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population Purchasing One or More Antidepressant or Antipsychotic Prescriptions by Select Sociodemographic Characteristics, 2013 and 2018.2021 Jun. In: Statistical Brief (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (US)) [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2001–. STATISTICAL BRIEF #535. 2021 Jun. In: Statistical Brief (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (US)) [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2001–. STATISTICAL BRIEF #535. PMID: 35696503 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Mood and microbes: a comprehensive review of intestinal microbiota's impact on depression.Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 9;15:1295766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1295766. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38404464 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"I was very sad, but not depressed": phenomenological differences between adjustment disorder and a major depressive episode.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 11;14:1291659. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1291659. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 38146279 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the Association Between Serotonergic Antidepressants and Blood Transfusion Requirements in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Comprehensive Analysis.Cureus. 2023 Sep 26;15(9):e45988. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45988. eCollection 2023 Sep. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37900430 Free PMC article.
-
Age-Dependent Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Nov;32(11):1229-1240. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0484. Epub 2023 Oct 19. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023. PMID: 37856151 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
