Interactive graphics for expressing health risks: development and qualitative evaluation
- PMID: 19657926
- PMCID: PMC4423614
- DOI: 10.1080/10810730903032960
Interactive graphics for expressing health risks: development and qualitative evaluation
Abstract
Recent findings suggest that interactive game-like graphics might be useful in communicating probabilities. We developed a prototype for a risk communication module, focusing on eliciting users' preferences for different interactive graphics and assessing usability and user interpretations. Feedback from five focus groups was used to design the graphics. The final version displayed a matrix of square buttons; clicking on any button allowed the user to see whether the stick figure underneath was affected by the health outcome. When participants used this interaction to learn about a risk, they expressed more emotional responses, both positive and negative, than when viewing any static graphic or numerical description of a risk. Their responses included relief about small risks and concern about large risks. The groups also commented on static graphics: arranging the figures affected by disease randomly throughout a group of figures made it more difficult to judge the proportion affected but often was described as more realistic. Interactive graphics appear to have potential for expressing risk magnitude as well as the feeling of risk. This affective impact could be useful in increasing perceived threat of high risks, calming fears about low risks, or comparing risks. Quantitative studies are planned to assess the effect on perceived risks and estimated risk magnitudes.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects of game-like interactive graphics on risk perceptions and decisions.Med Decis Making. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):130-42. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364847. Epub 2010 Apr 14. Med Decis Making. 2011. PMID: 20393103 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of arrangement of stick figures on estimates of proportion in risk graphics.Med Decis Making. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):143-50. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10369006. Epub 2010 Jul 29. Med Decis Making. 2011. PMID: 20671209 Free PMC article.
-
A combined qualitative method for testing an interactive risk communication tool.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11;2007:16-20. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007. PMID: 18693789 Free PMC article.
-
Insufficient evidence for interactive or animated graphics for communicating probability.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2760-2765. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae123. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38904366 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Visual design for the user interface, Part 1: Design fundamentals.J Biocommun. 1994;21(1):22-30. J Biocommun. 1994. PMID: 7516933 Review.
Cited by
-
The Role of Visualization in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Scoping Review.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 14;10:e60128. doi: 10.2196/60128. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024. PMID: 39401079 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Short Digital Food Frequency Questionnaire (DIGIKOST-FFQ) Assessing Dietary Intake and Other Lifestyle Factors Among Norwegians: Qualitative Evaluation With Focus Group Interviews and Usability Testing.JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 8;6(11):e35933. doi: 10.2196/35933. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 36346647 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiovascular risk communication strategies in primary prevention. A systematic review with narrative synthesis.J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3116-3140. doi: 10.1111/jan.15327. Epub 2022 Jun 19. J Adv Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35719002 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Checks: a qualitative video-stimulated recall interview study with practitioners.BJGP Open. 2021 Oct 26;5(5):BJGPO.2021.0049. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0049. Print 2021 Oct. BJGP Open. 2021. PMID: 34172476 Free PMC article.
-
Development and testing of a frailty-focused communication (FCOM) aid for older adults.Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):936-941. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 22. Geriatr Nurs. 2020. PMID: 32709372 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Armstrong K, Schwartz JS, Fitzgerald G, Putt m., Ubel PA. Effect of framing as gain versus loss on understanding and hypothetical treatment choices: survival and mortality curves. Medical Decision Making. 2002;22:76–83. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources