Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug;117(8):1265-71.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800153. Epub 2009 May 5.

Cancer incidence among former Love Canal residents

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Cancer incidence among former Love Canal residents

Lenore J Gensburg et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Aug.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The Love Canal was a rectangular 16-acre, 10-ft-deep chemical waste landfill situated in a residential neighborhood in Niagara Falls, New York. This seriously contaminated site came to public attention in 1978. Only one prior study examined cancer incidence in former residents of the Love Canal neighborhood (LC).

Objective: In this study we aimed to describe cancer incidence in former LC residents from 1979 to 1996 and to investigate whether it differs from that of New York State (NYS) and Niagara County (NC).

Methods: From 1978 to 1982, we interviewed 6,181 former residents, and 5,052 were eligible to be included in this study. In 1996, we identified 304 cancer diagnoses in this cohort using the NYS Cancer Registry. We compared LC cancer incidence with that of NYS and NC using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and we compared risks within the LC group by potential exposure to the landfill using survival analysis.

Results: SIRs were elevated for cancers of the bladder [SIR(NYS) = 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91-2.16] and kidney (SIR(NYS) = 1.48; 95% CI, 0.76-2.58). Although CIs included 1.00, other studies have linked these cancers to chemicals similar to those found at Love Canal. We also found higher rates of bladder cancer among residents exposed as children, based on two cases.

Conclusions: In explaining these excess risks, the role of exposure to the landfill is unclear given such limitations as a relatively small and incomplete study cohort, imprecise exposure measurements, and the exclusion of cancers diagnosed before 1979. Given the relatively young age of the cohort, further surveillance is warranted.

Keywords: Love Canal; cancer; community health; exposure assessment; hazardous waste sites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Love Canal Emergency Declaration Area (EDA). Reproduced from Gensburg et al. (2009) with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allison P. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1995.
    1. Altavista P, Belli S, Bianchi F, Binazzi A, Comba P, Del GR, et al. Cause-specific mortality in an area of Campania with numerous waste disposal sites [in Italian] Epidemiol Prev. 2004;28:311–321. - PubMed
    1. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) [[accessed 8 July 2009]];Toxicological Profiles. 2009 Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxpro2.html.
    1. Baker DB, Greenland S, Mendlein J, Harmon P. A health study of two communities near the Stringfellow waste disposal site. Arch Environ Health. 1988;43:325–334. - PubMed
    1. CDC. CDC WONDER: Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007. [[accessed 1 October 2007]]. Available: http://wonder.cdc.gov/

Publication types