Cell-size-dependent spindle elongation in the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryo
- PMID: 19682904
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.050
Cell-size-dependent spindle elongation in the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryo
Abstract
Cell size is one of the critical parameters controlling the size of intracellular structures. A well-known example is the constant nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio (N/C ratio) [1-5]. The length of the metaphase spindle is proportional to cell size, but it has an upper limit during early embryogenesis [6]. During anaphase, the mitotic spindle elongates and delivers the centrosomes and sister chromatids near the centers of the nascent daughter cells. Here, we quantified the relationship between spindle elongation and cell size in the early embryo of Caenorhabditis elegans and propose possible models for cell-size-dependent spindle elongation. Quantitative measurements revealed that the extent and speed of spindle elongation are correlated with cell size throughout early embryogenesis. RNAi knockdown of Galpha proteins and their regulators revealed that the spindles failed to fully elongate and that the speed of spindle elongation was almost constant regardless of cell size. Our results suggest that spindle elongation is controlled by two qualitatively distinct mechanisms, i.e., Galpha-dependent and -independent modes of elongation. Simulation analyses revealed that the constant-pulling model and the force-generator-limited model reproduced the dynamics of the Galpha-independent and Galpha-dependent mechanisms, respectively. These models also explain how the set length of spindles is achieved.
Comment in
-
Cellular allometry: the spindle in development and inheritance.Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 29;19(18):R846-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.028. Curr Biol. 2009. PMID: 19788876
Similar articles
-
The distribution of active force generators controls mitotic spindle position.Science. 2003 Jul 25;301(5632):518-21. doi: 10.1126/science.1086560. Science. 2003. PMID: 12881570
-
Cellular allometry: the spindle in development and inheritance.Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 29;19(18):R846-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.028. Curr Biol. 2009. PMID: 19788876
-
Evidence mounts for receptor-independent activation of heterotrimeric G proteins normally in vivo: positioning of the mitotic spindle in C. elegans.Sci STKE. 2003 Aug 19;2003(196):pe35. doi: 10.1126/stke.2003.196.pe35. Sci STKE. 2003. PMID: 12928525 Review.
-
Centrosome size sets mitotic spindle length in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos.Curr Biol. 2010 Feb 23;20(4):353-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.050. Epub 2010 Feb 4. Curr Biol. 2010. PMID: 20137951
-
Asymmetric cell division in C. elegans: cortical polarity and spindle positioning.Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:427-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.113823. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004. PMID: 15473847 Review.
Cited by
-
Myosin concentration underlies cell size-dependent scalability of actomyosin ring constriction.J Cell Biol. 2011 Nov 28;195(5):799-813. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201101055. J Cell Biol. 2011. PMID: 22123864 Free PMC article.
-
Microtubule Dynamics Scale with Cell Size to Set Spindle Length and Assembly Timing.Dev Cell. 2018 May 21;45(4):496-511.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.04.022. Dev Cell. 2018. PMID: 29787710 Free PMC article.
-
An asymmetric attraction model for the diversity and robustness of cell arrangement in nematodes.Development. 2017 Dec 1;144(23):4437-4449. doi: 10.1242/dev.154609. Development. 2017. PMID: 29183946 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative analysis of cytokinesis in situ during C. elegans postembryonic development.PLoS One. 2014 Oct 20;9(10):e110689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110689. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25329167 Free PMC article.
-
Spindle Architectural Features Must Be Considered Along With Cell Size to Explain the Timing of Mitotic Checkpoint Silencing.Front Physiol. 2021 Jan 28;11:596263. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.596263. eCollection 2020. Front Physiol. 2021. PMID: 33584330 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
