Investment decisions in influenza pandemic contingency planning: cost-effectiveness of stockpiling antiviral drugs

Eur J Public Health. 2009 Oct;19(5):516-20. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp119. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

Abstract

Background: The threat of an influenza pandemic has led to stockpiling of antiviral drugs in order to mitigate a plausible outbreak. If the stockpile would be used in relation to the recent pandemic alert, an investment decision about renewing the stock for a possible subsequent pandemic is essential. The decision should include cost-effectiveness considerations.

Methods: We constructed a cost-effectiveness analysis in the Dutch context, explicitly including risk of an outbreak. Outcomes from a dynamic transmission model, comparing an intervention with a non-intervention scenario, were input in our health economic calculations.

Results: Stockpiling was cost-effective from the health-care perspective if the actual risk is 37% for 30 years. If less than 60% of the population would take the antiviral drugs or the attack rate is about 50%, the investment would not be cost-effective from this perspective.

Conclusion: Risk perception, realistic coverage among population and size of a pandemic are crucial parameters and highly decisive for the investment decision.

MeSH terms

  • Antiviral Agents / economics*
  • Antiviral Agents / supply & distribution*
  • Antiviral Agents / therapeutic use
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Disease Outbreaks
  • Humans
  • Influenza, Human / drug therapy*
  • Influenza, Human / economics*
  • Influenza, Human / epidemiology
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Netherlands
  • Oseltamivir / economics
  • Oseltamivir / supply & distribution
  • Oseltamivir / therapeutic use
  • Risk Assessment

Substances

  • Antiviral Agents
  • Oseltamivir