Evaluating the success of phosphorus management from field to watershed

J Environ Qual. 2009 Aug 24;38(5):1981-8. doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0056. Print Sep-Oct 2009.

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated some P loss reduction following implementation of remedial strategies at field scales. However, there has been little coordinated evaluation of best management practices (BMPs) on a watershed scale to show where, when, and which work most effectively. Thus, it is still difficult to answer with a degree of certainty, critical questions such as, how long before we see a response and where would we expect to observe the greatest or least response? In cases where field and watershed scales are monitored, it is not uncommon for trends in P loss to be disconnected. We review case studies demonstrating that potential causes of the disconnect varies, from competing sources of P at watershed scales that are not reflected in field monitoring to an abundance of sinks at watershed scales that buffer field sources. To be successful, P-based mitigation strategies need to occur iteratively, involve stakeholder driven programs, and address the inherent complexity of all P sources within watersheds.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture
  • Conservation of Natural Resources
  • Environmental Restoration and Remediation
  • Phosphorus / analysis*
  • Phosphorus / chemistry
  • Water Pollutants / analysis*
  • Water Pollutants / chemistry
  • Water Pollution / prevention & control*
  • Water Supply*

Substances

  • Water Pollutants
  • Phosphorus