Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;253(2):443-52.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532082320. Epub 2009 Aug 25.

Disclosing harmful mammography errors to patients

Affiliations

Disclosing harmful mammography errors to patients

Thomas H Gallagher et al. Radiology. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess radiologists' attitudes about disclosing errors to patients by using a survey with a vignette involving an error interpreting a patient's mammogram, leading to a delayed cancer diagnosis.

Materials and methods: We conducted an institutional review board-approved survey of 364 radiologists at seven geographically distinct Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium sites that interpreted mammograms from 2005 to 2006. Radiologists received a vignette in which comparison screening mammograms were placed in the wrong order, leading a radiologist to conclude calcifications were decreasing in number when they were actually increasing, delaying a cancer diagnosis. Radiologists were asked (a) how likely they would be to disclose this error, (b) what information they would share, and (c) their malpractice attitudes and experiences.

Results: Two hundred forty-three (67%) of 364 radiologists responded to the disclosure vignette questions. Radiologists' responses to whether they would disclose the error included "definitely not" (9%), "only if asked by the patient" (51%), "probably" (26%), and "definitely" (14%). Regarding information they would disclose, 24% would "not say anything further to the patient," 31% would tell the patient that "the calcifications are larger and are now suspicious for cancer," 30% would state "the calcifications may have increased on your last mammogram, but their appearance was not as worrisome as it is now," and 15% would tell the patient "an error occurred during the interpretation of your last mammogram, and the calcifications had actually increased in number, not decreased." Radiologists' malpractice experiences were not consistently associated with their disclosure responses.

Conclusion: Many radiologists report reluctance to disclose a hypothetical mammography error that delayed a cancer diagnosis. Strategies should be developed to increase radiologists' comfort communicating with patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Relationship between disclosure willingness and disclosure content. Disclosure vignette is in text.

Comment in

  • The mea culpa conundrum.
    Berlin L. Berlin L. Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):284-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532090933. Radiology. 2009. PMID: 19864521 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gallagher TH, Studdert D, Levinson W. Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2713–2719 - PubMed
    1. Lo B. Resolving ethical dilemmas: a guide for clinicians. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005
    1. American Society for Health Care Risk Management Disclosure: what works now and what can work even better. Chicago, Ill: American Society for Health Care Risk Management, 2004 - PubMed
    1. American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs Code of medical ethics, annotated current opinions 2004–2005. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2005
    1. The Joint Commission Hospital accreditation standards, 2007. Oakbrook Terrace, Ill: Joint Commission Resources, 2007

Publication types