Synthetic graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery: objective and subjective outcomes

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Nov;20(11):1307-12. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: This study reports 1-year outcomes in women who underwent transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery with Prolift transvaginal mesh.

Methods: Pre- and postoperative objective vaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and subjective symptom and impact assessments (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ)-7, respectively) were performed. Postoperative vaginal tenderness, stricture, and patient satisfaction were also obtained. Paired t tests were utilized for analysis.

Results: Mean age was 61.8 +/- 9.8 years; mean follow-up interval was 425.0 +/- 80.0 days (range, 237-717). POP-Q measurements of Ba, Bp, and C were significantly improved (all p values <or= 0.001). PFDI and PFIQ subscale scores significantly improved (all p values <or= 0.004). Thirty-five of 48 (73%) were completely satisfied, and two (4%) were not satisfied. Complications (n (percent)) included graft exposure (1 (2%)), dyspareunia (2 (4%)), and granulation tissue (3 (6%)).

Conclusions: Women undergoing transvaginal repair of POP with the Prolift mesh system showed significant improvement in 1-year anatomic and subjective measures.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / instrumentation
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Quality of Life
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Suburethral Slings* / adverse effects
  • Surgical Mesh* / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Uterine Prolapse / surgery*