Ceftazidime vs. tobramycin for serious infections in urological patients

J Hosp Infect. 1990 Apr:15 Suppl A:69-76. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90083-z.

Abstract

A prospective, randomized study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of tobramycin and ceftazidime in the treatment of serious infections in 77 urological patients. Of the 39 tobramycin-treated and 38 ceftazidime-treated patients, 74% and 82%, respectively, were cured clinically. Microbiological cure rates were 72% and 79%, respectively. Three patients treated with tobramycin and two treated with ceftazidime developed a significant superinfection. Both drugs were tolerated well. Because of potential ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity the use of aminoglycosides is less advantageous than ceftazidime for seriously infected urological patients.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Ceftazidime / pharmacokinetics
  • Ceftazidime / pharmacology
  • Ceftazidime / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Sepsis / drug therapy*
  • Sepsis / microbiology
  • Tobramycin / adverse effects
  • Tobramycin / therapeutic use*
  • Urinary Tract Infections / drug therapy*
  • Urinary Tract Infections / microbiology
  • Urologic Diseases / surgery*

Substances

  • Ceftazidime
  • Tobramycin