Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):826-36.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3000. Epub 2009 Aug 28.

Describing and modeling workflow and information flow in chronic disease care

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Describing and modeling workflow and information flow in chronic disease care

Kim M Unertl et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of the study was to develop an in-depth understanding of work practices, workflow, and information flow in chronic disease care, to facilitate development of context-appropriate informatics tools.

Design: The study was conducted over a 10-month period in three ambulatory clinics providing chronic disease care. The authors iteratively collected data using direct observation and semi-structured interviews.

Measurements: The authors observed all aspects of care in three different chronic disease clinics for over 150 hours, including 157 patient-provider interactions. Observation focused on interactions among people, processes, and technology. Observation data were analyzed through an open coding approach. The authors then developed models of workflow and information flow using Hierarchical Task Analysis and Soft Systems Methodology. The authors also conducted nine semi-structured interviews to confirm and refine the models.

Results: The study had three primary outcomes: models of workflow for each clinic, models of information flow for each clinic, and an in-depth description of work practices and the role of health information technology (HIT) in the clinics. The authors identified gaps between the existing HIT functionality and the needs of chronic disease providers.

Conclusions: In response to the analysis of workflow and information flow, the authors developed ten guidelines for design of HIT to support chronic disease care, including recommendations to pursue modular approaches to design that would support disease-specific needs. The study demonstrates the importance of evaluating workflow and information flow in HIT design and implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview workflow diagrams for the MS, CF, and DM Clinics.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Generalized information flow model for chronic disease care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Electronic technology: A spark to revitalize primary care? J Am Med Assoc 2003;290(2):259-264. - PubMed
    1. Hunt D, Haynes R, Hanna S, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review J Am Med Assoc 1998;280(15):1339-1346. - PubMed
    1. Lapointe L, Rivard S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: Insights from case studies CMAJ 2006;174(11):1573-1578. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ash JS, Sittig D, Poon E, et al. The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14(4):415-423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bardram JE. I love the system—I just don't use it! Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. 1997. pp. 251-260.

Publication types