Venous thromboembolic events in hospitalised medical patients
- PMID: 19718471
- PMCID: PMC3062437
- DOI: 10.1160/TH09-03-0150
Venous thromboembolic events in hospitalised medical patients
Abstract
The number of acutely ill hospitalised medical patients at risk for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been well defined. Therefore, we used the 2003 United States Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to estimate VTE events among hospitalised medical patients. We then modeled the potential reduction in VTE with universal utilisation of appropriate pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. We calculated that 8,077,919 acutely ill hospitalised medical patients were at risk for VTE. Heart failure, respiratory failure, pneumonia, and cancer were the most common medical diagnoses. We estimated that 196,134 VTE-related events occurred in 2003, afflicting two out of every 100 acutely ill hospitalised medical patients. These VTE-related events were comprised of 122,235 symptomatic deep venous thromboses, 32,654 symptomatic episodes of pulmonary embolism, and 41,245 deaths due to VTE. In our model, rates of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis prescription were low for various acute medical illnesses, ranging from 15.3% to 49.2%. However, with universal thromboprophylaxis, 114,174 VTE-related events would have been prevented. In conclusion, acutely ill medical patients represent a large population vulnerable to the development of VTE during hospitalisation. The number of VTE-related events would be halved with universal thromboprophylaxis. Further efforts focused on improving VTE prevention strategies in hospitalised medical patients are warranted.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Long-term complications of medical patients with hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism.Thromb Haemost. 2009 Oct;102(4):688-93. doi: 10.1160/TH09-04-0266. Thromb Haemost. 2009. PMID: 19806254
-
New paradigms in venous thromboprophylaxis of medically ill patients.Thromb Haemost. 2017 Aug 30;117(9):1662-1670. doi: 10.1160/TH17-03-0168. Epub 2017 Jun 22. Thromb Haemost. 2017. PMID: 28640324
-
Prevention of venous thromboembolism through the implementation of a risk assessment tool: a comparative study in medical and surgical patients.Int Angiol. 2018 Oct;37(5):411-418. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.18.03969-X. Epub 2018 Feb 19. Int Angiol. 2018. PMID: 29463079
-
Extended thromboprophylaxis in the acutely ill medical patient after hospitalization - a paradigm shift in post-discharge thromboprophylaxis.Hosp Pract (1995). 2018 Feb;46(1):5-15. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2018.1410053. Epub 2017 Nov 30. Hosp Pract (1995). 2018. PMID: 29171776 Review.
-
Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Benefits and Risks of Thromboprophylaxis After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Oct 26;4(10):e002652. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002652. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015. PMID: 26504150 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Three-year Retrospective Study Looking at Preventing Hospital Acquired Thrombosis.Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2024;22(2):212-222. doi: 10.2174/0118715257269027231228114930. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2024. PMID: 38288832
-
Randomized Trial of Sequential Compression Versus Ankle-Calf Movement to Increase Femoral Venous Velocity.Cureus. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):e48070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48070. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37927740 Free PMC article.
-
Formal and informal venous thromboembolism risk assessment and impact on prescribing of thromboprophylaxis: a retrospective cohort study.Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Aug;45(4):864-874. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01578-w. Epub 2023 Apr 19. Int J Clin Pharm. 2023. PMID: 37074512 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative Challenges in a Septic Shock Patient With Extensive Splanchnic and Extra-Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis Up to the Right Atrium.Cureus. 2022 Dec 25;14(12):e32935. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32935. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36712719 Free PMC article.
-
Development of pulmonary embolism in a nonhospitalized patient with COVID-19 who did not receive venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Nov 16;77(23):1957-1960. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa286. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020. PMID: 32780839 Free PMC article.
References
-
- MacDougall DA, Feliu AL, Boccuzzi SJ, et al. Economic burden of deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and post-thrombotic syndrome. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63:S5–15. - PubMed
-
- Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, et al. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:698–707. - PubMed
-
- Lang IM, Klepetko W. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: an updated review. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2008;23:555–559. - PubMed
-
- Piazza G, Seddighzadeh A, Goldhaber SZ. Double trouble for 2,609 hospitalized medical patients who developed deep vein thrombosis: prophylaxis omitted more often and pulmonary embolism more frequent. Chest. 2007;132:554–561. - PubMed
