The net clinical benefit of warfarin anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation
- PMID: 19721017
- PMCID: PMC2777526
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00003
The net clinical benefit of warfarin anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation
Abstract
Background: Guidelines recommend warfarin use in patients with atrial fibrillation solely on the basis of risk for ischemic stroke without antithrombotic therapy. These guidelines rely on ischemic stroke rates observed in older trials and do not explicitly account for increased risk for hemorrhage.
Objective: To quantify the net clinical benefit of warfarin therapy in a cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation.
Design: Mixed retrospective and prospective cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation between 1996 and 2003.
Setting: An integrated health care delivery system.
Patients: 13 559 adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Measurements: Warfarin exposure, patient characteristics, CHADS(2) score (1 point for each of congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, and diabetes and 2 points for stroke), and outcome events were ascertained from health plan records and databases. Net clinical benefit was defined as the annual rate of ischemic strokes and systemic emboli prevented by warfarin minus intracranial hemorrhages attributable to warfarin, multiplied by an impact weight. The base-case impact weight was 1.5, reflecting the greater clinical impact of intracranial hemorrhage versus thromboembolism.
Results: Patients accumulated more than 66 000 person-years of follow-up. The adjusted net clinical benefit of warfarin for the cohort overall was 0.68% per year (95% CI, 0.34% to 0.87%). Adjusted net clinical benefit was greatest for patients with a history of ischemic stroke (2.48% per year [CI, 0.75% to 4.22%]) and for those 85 years or older (2.34% per year [CI, 1.29% to 3.30%]). The net clinical benefit of warfarin increased from essentially zero in CHADS(2) stroke risk categories 0 and 1 to 2.22% per year (CI, 0.58% to 3.75%) in CHADS(2) categories 4 to 6. The patterns of results were preserved when weighting factors for intracranial hemorrhage of 1.0 and 2.0 were used.
Limitations: Residual confounding is a possibility. Some outcome events were probably missed by the screening algorithm or when medical records were unavailable.
Conclusion: Expected net clinical benefit of warfarin therapy is highest among patients with the highest untreated risk for stroke, which includes the oldest age category. Risk assessment that incorporates both risk for thromboembolism and risk for intracranial hemorrhage provides a more quantitatively informed basis for the decision on antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Primary funding source: National Institute on Aging; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and Massachusetts General Hospital.
Figures
Comment in
-
Do current guidelines result in overuse of warfarin anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation?Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 1;151(5):355-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00012. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19721024 No abstract available.
-
The net clinical benefit of warfarin anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 16;152(4):264-5; author reply 265. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-4-201002160-00016. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157144 No abstract available.
-
The net clinical benefit of warfarin anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 16;152(4):265. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-4-201002160-00017. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157146 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Net benefit of warfarin in atrial fibrillation.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 1;151(5):I36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19721014 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Summaries for patients. Net benefit of warfarin in atrial fibrillation.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 1;151(5):I36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19721014 No abstract available.
-
Net Clinical Benefit of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Phase III Atrial Fibrillation Trials.Am J Med. 2015 Sep;128(9):1007-14.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Apr 22. Am J Med. 2015. PMID: 25910790 Clinical Trial.
-
Risk of stroke and intracranial hemorrhage in 9727 Chinese with atrial fibrillation in Hong Kong.Heart Rhythm. 2014 Aug;11(8):1401-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Apr 15. Heart Rhythm. 2014. PMID: 24747420
-
Current trial-associated outcomes with warfarin in prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 23;172(8):623-31; discussion 631-3. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.121. Epub 2012 Mar 26. Arch Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22450212 Review.
-
Effects of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 18;6(7):e005835. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005835. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28720644 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation: assessing net clinical benefit.Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024 Jul 31;26(Suppl 4):iv4-iv11. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae075. eCollection 2024 Jul. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024. PMID: 39099575 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Antagonists in Preventing Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62606. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62606. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39027793 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of Days Alive Out of Hospital as a Possible End Point in Trials of Stroke Prevention for Atrial Fibrillation: A ROCKET AF Analysis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):e028951. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028951. Epub 2024 May 23. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38780169 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Mar 28;21(3):251-314. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.03.009. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38665287 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of an Intracranial Hemorrhage Risk Score in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Oral Anticoagulant.Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 17;16:267-279. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S438013. eCollection 2024. Clin Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38645475 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA. 2001 Jun 13;285(22):2864–2870. - PubMed
-
- Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1449–57. [PMID: 8018000] - PubMed
-
- Go AS, Hylek EM, Chang Y, Phillips KA, Henault LE, Capra AM, et al. Anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: how well do randomized trials translate into clinical practice? JAMA. 2003;290:2685–92. [PMID: 14645310] - PubMed
-
- Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, et al. American College of Cardiology ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2006;8:651–745. [PMID: 16987906] - PubMed
-
- Singer DE, Albers GW, Dalen JE, Fang MC, Go AS, Halperin JL, et al. American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest. 2008;133:546S–592S. [PMID: 18574273] - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R01 AG015478-08/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- K23 AG028978-04/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- K23 AG028978-03/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG015478-07/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG015478/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- U19 HL091179-02/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- K23 AG028978-01/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- U19 HL091179/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- U19 HL091179-01/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG15478/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG015478-06/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- K23 AG028978-02/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- U19 HL091179-03/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- K23 AG28978/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- K23 AG028978/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical