Systematic review: charged-particle radiation therapy for cancer
- PMID: 19755348
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-8-200910200-00145
Systematic review: charged-particle radiation therapy for cancer
Abstract
Background: Radiation therapy with charged particles can potentially deliver maximum doses while minimizing irradiation of surrounding tissues, and it may be more effective or less harmful than other forms of radiation therapy.
Purpose: To review evidence about the benefits and harms of charged-particle radiation therapy for patients with cancer.
Data sources: MEDLINE (inception to 11 July 2009) was searched for publications in English, German, French, Italian, and Japanese. Web sites of manufacturers, treatment centers, and professional organizations were searched for relevant information.
Study selection: Four reviewers identified studies of any design that described clinical outcomes or adverse events in 10 or more patients with cancer treated with charged-particle radiation therapy.
Data extraction: The 4 reviewers extracted study, patient, and treatment characteristics; clinical outcomes; and adverse events for nonoverlapping sets of articles. A fifth reviewer verified data on comparative studies.
Data synthesis: Currently, 7 centers in the United States have facilities for particle (proton)-beam irradiation, and at least 4 are under construction, each costing between $100 and $225 million. In 243 eligible articles, charged-particle radiation therapy was used alone or in combination with other interventions for common (for example, lung, prostate, or breast) or uncommon (for example, skull-base tumors or uveal melanomas) types of cancer. Of 243 articles, 185 were single-group retrospective studies. Eight randomized and 9 nonrandomized clinical trials compared treatments with or without charged particles. No comparative study reported statistically significant or important differences in overall or cancer-specific survival or in total serious adverse events.
Limitation: Few studies directly compared treatments with or without particle irradiation.
Conclusion: Evidence on the comparative effectiveness and safety of charged-particle radiation therapy in cancer is needed to assess the benefits, risks, and costs of treatment alternatives.
Comment in
-
Randomized trials and technology assessment.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 20;151(8):583-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-8-200910200-00146. Epub 2009 Sep 14. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19755346 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The INTRABEAM® Photon Radiotherapy System for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(69):1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta19690. Health Technol Assess. 2015. PMID: 26323045 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Particle Beam Radiation Therapies for Cancer [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Nov. Report No.: 09-EHC019-EF. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Nov. Report No.: 09-EHC019-EF. PMID: 20704058 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Proton therapy - a systematic review of clinical effectiveness.Radiother Oncol. 2007 May;83(2):123-32. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 May 11. Radiother Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17499374 Review.
-
Comparative evaluation of radiation treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer: an updated systematic review.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Aug 2;155(3):171-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-3-201108020-00347. Epub 2011 Jun 6. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21646550 Review.
-
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Hologic 3D Mammography Selenia Dimensions System for Use in Breast Cancer Screening: A Single Technology Assessment [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. PMID: 29553669 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Health Economic Evaluation of Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 7;20(6):4727. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064727. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36981635 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Proton Beam Therapy for Esophageal Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 22;14(16):4045. doi: 10.3390/cancers14164045. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36011037 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The dose accumulation and the impact of deformable image registration on dose reporting parameters in a moving patient undergoing proton radiotherapy.Radiol Oncol. 2022 May 17;56(2):248-258. doi: 10.2478/raon-2022-0016. Radiol Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35575586 Free PMC article.
-
DNA damage response in prostate cancer cells by proton microbeam irradiation.Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(8):4811-4819. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2915. Transl Cancer Res. 2020. PMID: 35117844 Free PMC article.
-
Radiation Proctitis and Management Strategies.Clin Endosc. 2022 Jan;55(1):22-32. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.288. Epub 2021 Nov 18. Clin Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34788934 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources