Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
, 35 (12), 2018-27

Early Enteral Nutrition, Provided Within 24 H of Injury or Intensive Care Unit Admission, Significantly Reduces Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Early Enteral Nutrition, Provided Within 24 H of Injury or Intensive Care Unit Admission, Significantly Reduces Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Gordon S Doig et al. Intensive Care Med.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the provision of early standard enteral nutrition (EN) confers treatment benefits to critically ill patients.

Methods: Medline and EMBASE were searched. Hand citation review of retrieved guidelines and systematic reviews were undertaken, and academic and industry experts were contacted. Methodologically sound randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in critically ill patient populations that compared the delivery of standard EN, provided within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission or injury, to standard care were included. The primary analysis was conducted on clinically meaningful patient-oriented outcomes. Secondary analyses considered vomiting/regurgitation, pneumonia, bacteraemia, sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Meta-analyses were conducted using the odds ratio (OR) metric and a fixed effects model. The impact of heterogeneity was assessed using the I (2) metric.

Results: Six RCTs with 234 participants were analysed. The provision of early EN was associated with a significant reduction in mortality [OR = 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.85] and pneumonia (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.78). There were no other significant differences in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis and a simulation exercise confirmed the presence of a mortality reduction.

Conclusion: Although the detection of a statistically significant reduction in mortality is promising, overall trial quality was low, trial size was small, and the findings may be restricted to the patient groups enrolled into included trials. The results of this meta-analysis should be confirmed by the conduct of a large multi-centre trial enrolling diverse critically ill patient groups.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 78 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1991 Jul-Aug;15(4):376-83 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jan;34(1):98-102 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58 - PubMed
    1. Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;25(2):210-23 - PubMed
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Mar;42(3):536-41 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback