Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov 1;17(21):7593-605.
doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.08.065. Epub 2009 Sep 6.

Effect of potential amine prodrugs of selective neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on blood-brain barrier penetration

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Effect of potential amine prodrugs of selective neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on blood-brain barrier penetration

Richard B Silverman et al. Bioorg Med Chem. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Several prodrug approaches were taken to mask amino groups in two potent and selective neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) inhibitors containing either a primary or secondary amino group to lower the charge and improve blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration. The primary amine was masked as an azide and the secondary amine as an amide or carbamate. The azide was not reduced to the amine under a variety of in vitro and ex vivo conditions. Despite the decrease in charge of the amino group as an amide and as carbamates, BBB penetration did not increase. It appears that the uses of azides as prodrugs for primary amines or amides and carbamates as prodrugs for secondary amines are not universally effective for CNS applications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Primary amine prodrug analogues
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure of nNOS inhibitor 5, and analogs 6-8, designed to test whether removing a charge and increasing lipophilicity leads to greater BBB penetration.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
i) nBuLi, THF, −78 °C to rt, 30 min, then 10, −78 °C to rt, 4h; ii) NaH, DMF, 0 °C, 30 min, then BnBr, rt, 16h; iii) PPh3, DIAD, AcOH, THF, rt, 16h; iv) 1N NaOH (aq), MeOH, rt, 16h; v) NaH, DMF, 0 °C, 30 min, then allyl bromide; vi) O3, MeOH, −78 °C, 1h, then NaBH4, rt, 3h; vii) H2, Pd / C, MeOH, 2d; viii) PPh3, DIAD, DPPA, THF, rt, 16h; ix) 4N HCl, dioxanes, rt, 16h.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
i) Hg(tBuCOO)2, pivalic acid, 80 °C; ii) BH3-THF, then Boc2O, p-dioxane, 10% NaHCO3; iii) H2, Pd/C, MeOH/H2O/AcOH; iv) Fmoc-Arg(NO2)-OH, TFFH, HOAt, CH2Cl2/aq. NaHCO3; v) BH3-THF, −10 °C; vi) 20% piperidine, DMF, then 21, DIEA, CH3CN; vii) TFA, CH2Cl2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Incubation of 1 and 3 in fresh mouse plasma. The area under the peak was integrated and the value was normalized based on the integration at 0 min. Two diastereoisomers of 3 are shown separately (3A and 3B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Formation of compound 4 from prodrug 3 during incubation in fresh mouse plasma (not normalized)
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
i) Ac2O, MeOH, rt, 1h; ii) H2, Pd(OH)2 / C, MeOH, 60 °C, 1-2 d; iii) 4N HCl, dioxanes, rt 16h
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
i) ClCOOMe, MeOH, rt, 4h; ii) 4N HCl, dioxanes, rt 16h; iii) ClCOOBn, MeOH, rt 4h.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Metabolic stability of 5 with microsomes at 37 °C. The experiment was performed in the presence (5 red) and absence (5 ox) of additional NADPH. Minaprine concentration at 20 min was >0 but was not quantifiable.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Concentration of 5 in plasma after an i.p. dose of 3.7 mg/kg. Error bars show standard error mean.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison of the brain concentrations of 5 and 6 after administration of 3.7 mg/kg and 4.1 mg/kg respectively. Error bars show standard error mean.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Concentration of 6 in plasma after a dose of 4.1 mg/kg. Error bars show standard error mean.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Comparison of the brain concentrations of 5 and 7 after a dose of 3.7 and 4.3 mg/kg, respectively. Error bars show the standard error mean.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Comparison of the brain concentrations of 5 and 8 after a dose of 3.7 and 5.1 mg/kg, respectively. Error bars show the standard error mean.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Comparison of the plasma levels of 5, 6, 7, 8, 36 after i.p. injection.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Comparison of brain concentrations of 5, 6, 7, 8, 36 after i.p. injection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. IMS Retail Drug Monitor

    1. Rubin LL, Staddon JM. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1999;22:11. - PubMed
    1. Ballabh P, Braun A, Nedergaard M. Neurobiol. Dis. 2004;16:1. - PubMed
    1. Pardridge WM. Drug Discov. Today. 2001;6:1. - PubMed
    1. Doan KMM, Humphreys JE, Webster LO, Wring SA, Shampine LJ, Serabjit-Singh CJ, Adkison KK, Polli JW. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002;303:1029. - PubMed
    2. Pardridge WM. J. Neurochem. 1998;70:1781. - PubMed
    3. Zhao YH, Abraham MH, Ibrahim A, Fish PV, Cole S, Lewis ML, de Groot MJ, Reynolds DP. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007;47:170. - PubMed
    4. Liu XR, Smith BJ, Chen CP, Callegari E, Becker SL, Chen X, Cianfrogna J, Doran AC, Doran SD, Gibbs JP, Hosea N, Liu JH, Nelson FR, Szewc MA, Van Deusen J. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005;313:1254. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources