Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis

Twenty bone-mineral-density loci identified by large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies

Fernando Rivadeneira et al. Nat Genet. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) is a heritable complex trait used in the clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis and the assessment of fracture risk. We performed meta-analysis of five genome-wide association studies of femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD in 19,195 subjects of Northern European descent. We identified 20 BMD loci that reached genome-wide significance (GWS; P < 5 x 10(-8)), of which 13 map to regions not previously associated with this trait: 1p31.3 (GPR177), 2p21 (SPTBN1), 3p22 (CTNNB1), 4q21.1 (MEPE), 5q14 (MEF2C), 7p14 (STARD3NL), 7q21.3 (FLJ42280), 11p11.2 (LRP4, ARHGAP1, F2), 11p14.1 (DCDC5), 11p15 (SOX6), 16q24 (FOXL1), 17q21 (HDAC5) and 17q12 (CRHR1). The meta-analysis also confirmed at GWS level seven known BMD loci on 1p36 (ZBTB40), 6q25 (ESR1), 8q24 (TNFRSF11B), 11q13.4 (LRP5), 12q13 (SP7), 13q14 (TNFSF11) and 18q21 (TNFRSF11A). The many SNPs associated with BMD map to genes in signaling pathways with relevance to bone metabolism and highlight the complex genetic architecture that underlies osteoporosis and variation in BMD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Quantile-Quantile (Q-Q) plots for: A. Lumbar Spine BMD and B. Femoral Neck BMD; comparing additive model statistics to those expected under the null distribution using fixed-effects for all analyzed HapMap CEU imputed SNPs passing quality-control (QC) criteria in the studies (red lines), and after exclusion of all genome-wide significant and correlated (r2>0.1) SNPs (blue lines).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Quantile-Quantile (Q-Q) plots for: A. Lumbar Spine BMD and B. Femoral Neck BMD; comparing additive model statistics to those expected under the null distribution using fixed-effects for all analyzed HapMap CEU imputed SNPs passing quality-control (QC) criteria in the studies (red lines), and after exclusion of all genome-wide significant and correlated (r2>0.1) SNPs (blue lines).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Manhattan plots displaying novel and previously reported (known) loci associated at genome-wide significant level (GWS) with Lumbar Spine BMD (top) and Femoral Neck BMD (bottom) for all 2,543,686 HapMap CEU-imputed SNPs analyzed using fixed-effects. The 13 new GWS loci are in bold and underlined type. Already reported GWS loci are in blue type.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Manhattan plots displaying novel and previously reported (known) loci associated at genome-wide significant level (GWS) with Lumbar Spine BMD (top) and Femoral Neck BMD (bottom) for all 2,543,686 HapMap CEU-imputed SNPs analyzed using fixed-effects. The 13 new GWS loci are in bold and underlined type. Already reported GWS loci are in blue type.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest Plots for the top SNPs for each of the 9 novel loci: A. 1p31.3, B. 3p22, C. 5q14, D. 7p14, E. 7q21.3, F. 11p15, G. 11p14.1, H. 16q24, I. 17q12. Black squares represent effect estimate and 95%CI for each study, and the red diamonds are summary effect. Measurements units are in BMD standard deviations (SD).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest Plots for the top SNPs for each of the 4 loci attaining GWS for the first time in this study: A. 2p21, B. 4q21.1, C. 11p11.2, D. 17q21. Black squares represent effect estimate and 95%CI for each study, and the red diamonds are summary effect estimates. Measurements units are in BMD standard deviations (SD).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Histogram and line plot modeling in the Rotterdam Study the combined allelic effect across all genome-wide significant associated loci for A. Lumbar Spine BMD and B. Femoral neck BMD. Subjects were classified according to the number of BMD decreasing (risk) alleles at the lumbar spine BMD (20 SNPs) and the femoral neck (15 SNPs). The mean for each risk allele-count group was determined and the extremes of the distribution counts were pooled into the nearest risk allele-count group of size >100 individuals.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Histogram and line plot modeling in the Rotterdam Study the combined allelic effect across all genome-wide significant associated loci for A. Lumbar Spine BMD and B. Femoral neck BMD. Subjects were classified according to the number of BMD decreasing (risk) alleles at the lumbar spine BMD (20 SNPs) and the femoral neck (15 SNPs). The mean for each risk allele-count group was determined and the extremes of the distribution counts were pooled into the nearest risk allele-count group of size >100 individuals.

Similar articles

  • European bone mineral density loci are also associated with BMD in East-Asian populations.
    Styrkarsdottir U, Halldorsson BV, Gudbjartsson DF, Tang NL, Koh JM, Xiao SM, Kwok TC, Kim GS, Chan JC, Cherny S, Lee SH, Kwok A, Ho S, Gretarsdottir S, Kostic JP, Palsson ST, Sigurdsson G, Sham PC, Kim BJ, Kung AW, Kim SY, Woo J, Leung PC, Kong A, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stefansson K. Styrkarsdottir U, et al. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 7;5(10):e13217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013217. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20949110 Free PMC article.
  • Multistage genome-wide association meta-analyses identified two new loci for bone mineral density.
    Zhang L, Choi HJ, Estrada K, Leo PJ, Li J, Pei YF, Zhang Y, Lin Y, Shen H, Liu YZ, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Zhang JG, Tian Q, Wang YP, Han Y, Ran S, Hai R, Zhu XZ, Wu S, Yan H, Liu X, Yang TL, Guo Y, Zhang F, Guo YF, Chen Y, Chen X, Tan L, Zhang L, Deng FY, Deng H, Rivadeneira F, Duncan EL, Lee JY, Han BG, Cho NH, Nicholson GC, McCloskey E, Eastell R, Prince RL, Eisman JA, Jones G, Reid IR, Sambrook PN, Dennison EM, Danoy P, Yerges-Armstrong LM, Streeten EA, Hu T, Xiang S, Papasian CJ, Brown MA, Shin CS, Uitterlinden AG, Deng HW. Zhang L, et al. Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Apr 1;23(7):1923-33. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt575. Epub 2013 Nov 17. Hum Mol Genet. 2014. PMID: 24249740 Free PMC article.
  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture.
    Estrada K, Styrkarsdottir U, Evangelou E, Hsu YH, Duncan EL, Ntzani EE, Oei L, Albagha OM, Amin N, Kemp JP, Koller DL, Li G, Liu CT, Minster RL, Moayyeri A, Vandenput L, Willner D, Xiao SM, Yerges-Armstrong LM, Zheng HF, Alonso N, Eriksson J, Kammerer CM, Kaptoge SK, Leo PJ, Thorleifsson G, Wilson SG, Wilson JF, Aalto V, Alen M, Aragaki AK, Aspelund T, Center JR, Dailiana Z, Duggan DJ, Garcia M, Garcia-Giralt N, Giroux S, Hallmans G, Hocking LJ, Husted LB, Jameson KA, Khusainova R, Kim GS, Kooperberg C, Koromila T, Kruk M, Laaksonen M, Lacroix AZ, Lee SH, Leung PC, Lewis JR, Masi L, Mencej-Bedrac S, Nguyen TV, Nogues X, Patel MS, Prezelj J, Rose LM, Scollen S, Siggeirsdottir K, Smith AV, Svensson O, Trompet S, Trummer O, van Schoor NM, Woo J, Zhu K, Balcells S, Brandi ML, Buckley BM, Cheng S, Christiansen C, Cooper C, Dedoussis G, Ford I, Frost M, Goltzman D, González-Macías J, Kähönen M, Karlsson M, Khusnutdinova E, Koh JM, Kollia P, Langdahl BL, Leslie WD, Lips P, Ljunggren Ö, Lorenc RS, Marc J, Mellström D, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Olmos JM, Pettersson-Kymmer U, Reid DM, Riancho JA, Ridker PM, Rousseau F, Slagboom PE, Tang NL, Urreizti R, Van Hul W, Viikari J, Zarrabeitia MT, Aulch… See abstract for full author list ➔ Estrada K, et al. Nat Genet. 2012 Apr 15;44(5):491-501. doi: 10.1038/ng.2249. Nat Genet. 2012. PMID: 22504420 Free PMC article.
  • Clinical review: Genome-wide association studies of skeletal phenotypes: what we have learned and where we are headed.
    Hsu YH, Kiel DP. Hsu YH, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Oct;97(10):E1958-77. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1890. Epub 2012 Sep 10. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012. PMID: 22965941 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Dissecting the Genetics of Osteoporosis using Systems Approaches.
    Al-Barghouthi BM, Farber CR. Al-Barghouthi BM, et al. Trends Genet. 2019 Jan;35(1):55-67. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 20. Trends Genet. 2019. PMID: 30470485 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Ellies DL, et al. Bone density ligand, Sclerostin, directly interacts with LRP5 but not LRP5G171V to modulate Wnt activity. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:1738–49. - PubMed
    1. Theoleyre S, et al. The molecular triad Opg/RANK/RANKL: involvement in the orchestration of pathophysiological bone remodeling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2004;15:457–75. - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide scans provides evidence for sex- and site-specific regulation of bone mass. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:173–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP. Genetic associations: false or true? Trends Mol Med. 2003;9:135–8. - PubMed

Publication types