Using nontraditional risk factors in coronary heart disease risk assessment: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
- PMID: 19805770
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-7-200910060-00008
Using nontraditional risk factors in coronary heart disease risk assessment: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
Abstract
Description: New recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) on the use of nontraditional, or novel, risk factors in assessing the coronary heart disease (CHD) risk of asymptomatic persons.
Methods: Systematic reviews were conducted of literature since 1996 on 9 proposed nontraditional markers of CHD risk: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, ankle-brachial index, leukocyte count, fasting blood glucose, periodontal disease, carotid intima-media thickness, coronary artery calcification score on electron-beam computed tomography, homocysteine, and lipoprotein(a). The reviews followed a hierarchical approach aimed at determining which factors could practically and definitively reassign persons assessed as intermediate-risk according to their Framingham score to either a high-risk or low-risk strata, and thereby improve outcomes by means of aggressive risk-factor modification in those newly assigned to the high-risk stratum.
Recommendation: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of using the nontraditional risk factors studied to screen asymptomatic men and women with no history of CHD to prevent CHD events. (I statement).
Comment in
-
The USPSTF recommendation statement on coronary heart disease risk assessment.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 16;152(6):403-4; author reply 405-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00016. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20231576 No abstract available.
-
The USPSTF recommendation statement on coronary heart disease risk assessment.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 16;152(6):403; author reply 405-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00015. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20231577 No abstract available.
-
The USPSTF recommendation statement on coronary heart disease risk assessment.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 16;152(6):404-5; author reply 405-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00017. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20231578 No abstract available.
-
The USPSTF recommendation statement on coronary heart disease risk assessment.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 16;152(6):405; author reply 405-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00018. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20231580 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Using nontraditional risk factors to estimate risk for coronary heart disease.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 6;151(7):I-38. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-7-200910060-00003. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19805766 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Risk Assessment for Cardiovascular Disease With Nontraditional Risk Factors: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2018 Jul 17;320(3):272-280. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8359. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29998297
-
Screening for coronary heart disease with electrocardiography: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 2;157(7):512-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00514. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22847227
-
Emerging risk factors for coronary heart disease: a summary of systematic reviews conducted for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 6;151(7):496-507. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-7-200910060-00010. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19805772 Review.
-
Screening for peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular disease risk assessment with the ankle-brachial index in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Sep 3;159(5):342-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-5-201309030-00008. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 24026320
-
Nontraditional Risk Factors in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2018 Jul 17;320(3):281-297. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4242. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29998301 Review.
Cited by
-
Longitudinal evaluation of manufacturer-specific differences for high-sensitive CRP EQA results.Front Mol Biosci. 2024 Aug 8;11:1401405. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1401405. eCollection 2024. Front Mol Biosci. 2024. PMID: 39176390 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of vascular screening interventions on perceived threat, efficacy beliefs and behavioural intentions: a systematic narrative review.Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3):daad040. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad040. Health Promot Int. 2023. PMID: 37279474 Free PMC article.
-
Mortality of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction without standard modifiable risk factors among patients without known coronary artery disease: Age-stratified and sex-related analysis from nationwide readmissions database 2010-2014.Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Feb 24;14:100474. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100474. eCollection 2023 Jun. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36923367 Free PMC article.
-
Elevated HsCRP in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Study of Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Oct 7;17:2517-2528. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S380194. eCollection 2022. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022. PMID: 36237420 Free PMC article.
-
Suboptimal oral health and the risk of cardiovascular disease in the presence of competing death: a data linkage analysis.Can J Public Health. 2023 Feb;114(1):125-137. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00675-z. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Can J Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36068436 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials