Public survey and survival data do not support recommendations to discontinue prostate-specific antigen screening in men at age 75
- PMID: 19815259
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.091
Public survey and survival data do not support recommendations to discontinue prostate-specific antigen screening in men at age 75
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation to discontinue prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening at age 75.
Methods: Public survey: A cohort of 340 patients was surveyed at our PSA screening clinic and stratified by awareness of the recommendation and education level. Age (< 75, >or= 75), race, health insurance status, knowledge of prostate cancer, and opinion on screening discontinuation at age 75 was evaluated between groups. Disease risk and survival analysis: A cohort of 4196 men who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 2008 was stratified into age groups: < 65, 65-74, and >or= 75. Associations between clinicopathologic variables, disease risk, and survival were compared between age groups using univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results: Approximately 78% of men surveyed disagreed with the USPSTF recommendation. The number of men who disagreed was not significantly different between awareness groups (P = .962). Awareness of new screening guidelines showed a significant difference (P = .006) between education groups. Age >or= 75 years was predictive of high-risk disease based on D'Amico's criteria (odds ratio = 2.72, P = .003). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses showed an association of men aged >or= 75 years with higher rate of PSA recurrence, distant metastasis, and disease specific death compared with the age groups of < 65 and 65-74 (P <.05).
Conclusions: Men presenting to our PSA screening clinic disagreed with discontinuation of screening at age 75. Men aged >or= 75 years had higher risk disease and poorer survival. The USPSTF recommendation was supported neither by public opinion nor disease risk and survival results.
Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Comment in
-
Editorial comment.Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1128; author reply 1128-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1248. Urology. 2010. PMID: 20451732 No abstract available.
-
Editorial comment.Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1129-30; author reply 1130. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.074. Urology. 2010. PMID: 20451733 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Men older than 70 years have higher risk prostate cancer and poorer survival in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras.J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.034. Epub 2009 Sep 16. J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19758616
-
Prostate-specific antigen/prostatic acid phosphatase ratio is significant prognostic factor in patients with stage IV prostate cancer.Urology. 2007 Oct;70(4):702-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.019. Urology. 2007. PMID: 17991541
-
Natural history of disease progression in patients who fail to achieve an undetectable prostate-specific antigen level after undergoing radical prostatectomy.Cancer. 2004 Dec 1;101(11):2549-56. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20637. Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15470681
-
The prostate-specific antigen screening conundrum: examining the evidence.Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011 Nov;27(4):251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2011.07.003. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011. PMID: 22018404 Review.
-
[Prostate cancer--new guidelines and the first care program].Lakartidningen. 2015 Jan 27;112:C6XC. Lakartidningen. 2015. PMID: 25625726 Review. Swedish.
Cited by
-
Have screening harms become newsworthy? News coverage of prostate and colorectal cancer screening since the 2008 USPSTF recommendation changes.J Behav Med. 2014 Dec;37(6):1242-51. doi: 10.1007/s10865-014-9572-7. Epub 2014 May 24. J Behav Med. 2014. PMID: 24859436
-
More aggressive prostate cancer in elderly men.Rev Urol. 2013;15(4):202-4. Rev Urol. 2013. PMID: 24659918 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
