Cost effectiveness analysis of including boys in a human papillomavirus vaccination programme in the United States
- PMID: 19815582
- PMCID: PMC2759438
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b3884
Cost effectiveness analysis of including boys in a human papillomavirus vaccination programme in the United States
Abstract
Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of including preadolescent boys in a routine human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme for preadolescent girls.
Design: Cost effectiveness analysis from the societal perspective.
Setting: United States.
Population: Girls and boys aged 12 years.
Interventions: HPV vaccination of girls alone and of girls and boys in the context of screening for cervical cancer. Main outcome measure Incremental cost effectiveness ratios, expressed as cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
Results: With 75% vaccination coverage and an assumption of complete, lifelong vaccine efficacy, routine HPV vaccination of 12 year old girls was consistently less than $50,000 per QALY gained compared with screening alone. Including preadolescent boys in a routine vaccination programme for preadolescent girls resulted in higher costs and benefits and generally had cost effectiveness ratios that exceeded $100,000 per QALY across a range of HPV related outcomes, scenarios for cervical cancer screening, and assumptions of vaccine efficacy and duration. Vaccinating both girls and boys fell below a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY only under scenarios of high, lifelong vaccine efficacy against all HPV related diseases (including other non-cervical cancers and genital warts), or scenarios of lower efficacy with lower coverage or lower vaccine costs.
Conclusions: Given currently available information, including boys in an HPV vaccination programme generally exceeds conventional thresholds of good value for money, even under favourable conditions of vaccine protection and health benefits. Uncertainty still exists in many areas that can either strengthen or attenuate our findings. As new information emerges, assumptions and analyses will need to be iteratively revised to continue to inform policies for HPV vaccination.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Comment in
-
Should HPV vaccine be given to men?BMJ. 2009 Oct 8;339:b4127. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4127. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19815585 No abstract available.
-
HPV vaccination. What about male specific HPV related diseases?BMJ. 2009 Nov 2;339:b4514. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4514. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19884205 No abstract available.
-
HPV vaccination. Inaccurate assumptions about oropharyngeal cancer.BMJ. 2009 Nov 2;339:b4525. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4525. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19884209 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prophylaxis of cervical cancer and related cervical disease: a review of the cost-effectiveness of vaccination against oncogenic HPV types.J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Apr;16(3):217-30. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.3.217. J Manag Care Pharm. 2010. PMID: 20331326 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health and economic implications of HPV vaccination in the United States.N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 21;359(8):821-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0707052. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18716299 Free PMC article.
-
The value of male human papillomavirus vaccination in preventing cervical cancer and genital warts in a low-resource setting.BJOG. 2016 May;123(6):917-26. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13503. Epub 2015 Jul 14. BJOG. 2016. PMID: 26176301
-
Incremental cost-effectiveness evaluation of vaccinating girls against cervical cancer pre- and post-sexual debut in Belgium.Vaccine. 2013 Aug 20;31(37):3962-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jun 15. Vaccine. 2013. PMID: 23777952
-
[Efficiency of human papillomavirus vaccination--estimates based on Dutch cost effectiveness analyses].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A356. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009. PMID: 19930733 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Ensuring equity with pre-clinical planning for chlamydia vaccines.NPJ Vaccines. 2023 Sep 6;8(1):131. doi: 10.1038/s41541-023-00726-7. NPJ Vaccines. 2023. PMID: 37673890 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Are intersectoral costs considered in economic evaluations of interventions relating to sexually transmitted infections (STIs)? A systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;22(1):2180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14484-z. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36434561 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal non-pharmaceutical intervention policy for Covid-19 epidemic via neuroevolution algorithm.Evol Med Public Health. 2022 Jan 28;10(1):59-70. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoac002. eCollection 2022. Evol Med Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35169480 Free PMC article.
-
Vaccinating for Whom? Distinguishing between Self-Protective, Paternalistic, Altruistic and Indirect Vaccination.Public Health Ethics. 2020 Mar 11;13(2):190-200. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa005. eCollection 2020 Jul. Public Health Ethics. 2020. PMID: 33294030 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination for adults through age 45 years in the United States: Estimates from a simplified transmission model.Vaccine. 2020 Nov 25;38(50):8032-8039. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Oct 27. Vaccine. 2020. PMID: 33121846 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Parkin DM, Bray F. Chapter 2: the burden of HPV-related cancers. Vaccine 2006;24(suppl 3):S11-25. - PubMed
-
- Watson M, Saraiya M, Ahmed F, Cardinez CJ, Reichman ME, Weir HK, et al. Using population-based cancer registry data to assess the burden of human papillomavirus-associated cancers in the United States: overview of methods. Cancer 2008;113(suppl 10):2841-54. - PubMed
-
- Lacey CJ, Lowndes CM, Shah KV. Chapter 4: burden and management of non-cancerous HPV-related conditions: HPV-6/11 disease. Vaccine 2006;24(suppl 3):S35-41. - PubMed
-
- Garland SM, Hernandez-Avila M, Wheeler CM, Perez G, Harper DM, Leodolter S, et al. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1928-43. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials