Minnesota's Nursing Facility Performance-Based Incentive Payment Program: an innovative model for promoting care quality
- PMID: 19846473
- DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnp140
Minnesota's Nursing Facility Performance-Based Incentive Payment Program: an innovative model for promoting care quality
Abstract
Purpose: Minnesota's Nursing Facility Performance-Based Incentive Payment Program (PIPP) supports provider-initiated projects aimed at improving care quality and efficiency. PIPP moves beyond conventional pay for performance. It seeks to promote implementation of evidence-based practices, encourage innovation and risk taking, foster collaboration and shared learning, and establish a solid case for investing in better quality from the perspective of the state, providers, and consumers. We explain PIPP rationale and design, describe projects and participating facilities, and present findings from interviews with project leaders.
Design and methods: Provider-initiated projects lasting from 1 to 3 years are selected through a competitive process and are funded for up to 5% of the daily operating per diem rate. Providers are at risk of losing up to 20% of their project funding if they fail to achieve targets on state nursing facility performance measures.
Results: Minnesota has made a major investment in the PIPP by supporting 45 individual or collaborative projects, representing approximately 160 facilities and annual funding of approximately $18 million. Projects involve a wide range of interventions, such as fall reduction, wound prevention, exercise, improved continence, pain management, resident-centered care and culture change, and transitions to the community.
Implications: The PIPP can serve as a model for other states seeking to promote nursing facility quality either in combination or in place of conventional pay-for-performance efforts.
Similar articles
-
Minnesota's provider-initiated approach yields care quality gains at participating nursing homes.Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1631-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0294. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013. PMID: 24019369
-
Medicaid nursing home pay for performance: where do we stand?Gerontologist. 2009 Oct;49(5):587-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp044. Epub 2009 May 20. Gerontologist. 2009. PMID: 19458344
-
The early experience of a hospital-based pay-for-performance program.J Healthc Manag. 2007 Mar-Apr;52(2):95-107; discussion 107-8. J Healthc Manag. 2007. PMID: 17447537
-
The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology.Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):350-9. Pediatrics. 1999. PMID: 9917477 Review.
-
Rise of pay for performance: implications for care of people with chronic kidney disease.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Sep;2(5):1087-95. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00510107. Epub 2007 Aug 16. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007. PMID: 17702735 Review.
Cited by
-
Unmet and Unimportant Preferences Among Nursing Home Residents: What Are Key Resident and Facility Factors?J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Nov;21(11):1712-1717. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.033. Epub 2020 Jul 29. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32739282 Free PMC article.
-
Effective health care for older people living and dying in care homes: a realist review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 16;16:269. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1493-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27422733 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transitions in Care in a Nationally Representative Sample of Older Americans with Dementia.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Aug;63(8):1495-502. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13540. Epub 2015 Jul 22. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015. PMID: 26200764 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
