Changes in gender distribution of urinary stone disease
- PMID: 19854493
- PMCID: PMC3410535
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.007
Changes in gender distribution of urinary stone disease
Abstract
Objectives: To explore using population-based data the extent to which gender-specific rates of stone disease are changing. Historically, stone disease has been more common among men than women. However, differential changes in dietary intake patterns, fluid intake, and obesity in men and women may cause shifts in stone disease incidence and prevalence.
Methods: The State Ambulatory Surgical Database and the State Inpatient Databases were queried for procedures related to renal colic or urolithiasis. Population-based rates of utilization were calculated for the years 1998-2004 by gender. Poisson regression models were fit to measure changes in utilization rates over time.
Results: Of the 107,411 discharges for stone disease, 41,272 (38%) occurred in women. Service utilization increased in both men and women (86.6-105.5 and 42.5-64.4 per 100,000; P <.01 in both). However, the growth rate in women outpaced men (P <.01). Rates of outpatient (57.2-65.8 and 27.0-38.9 per 100,000; P <.01) and ambulatory surgery center utilization (6.4-17.7 and 2.9-9.3 per 100,000 men and women; P <.01) increased significantly in men and women, but inpatient utilization only increased in women (12.5-16.3 per 100,000; P <.01).
Conclusions: Resource utilization for stone disease continues to increase. Most of this increase appears to be due to an increase in disease among women. Increasing obesity, dietary changes, or decreased fluid intake may be contributing to the rapid increase in stone disease treatments in women.
2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Changing practice locations for upper urinary tract stone disease.J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1005-11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jul 18. J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19616795 Free PMC article.
-
Urolithiasis through the ages: data on more than 200,000 urinary stone analyses.J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1304-11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.073. Epub 2011 Feb 22. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21334658
-
Pediatric hospitalizations for upper urinary tract calculi: Epidemiological and treatment trends in the United States, 2001-2014.J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Feb;14(1):13.e1-13.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 7. J Pediatr Urol. 2018. PMID: 28966022
-
[Urolithiasis in clinical practice. Occurrence, etiology, investigation and preventive treatment].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Oct 10;116(24):2897-902. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996. PMID: 8975407 Review. Norwegian.
-
Current aspects of epidemiology and nutrition in urinary stone disease.World J Urol. 1997;15(3):165-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02201853. World J Urol. 1997. PMID: 9228723 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing spinal anesthesia approaches for transurethral lithotripsy in patients with proximal ureteral stones: A randomized clinical trial of bupivacaine alone versus bupivacaine with fentanyl.J Med Life. 2023 Oct;16(10):1508-1513. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0109. J Med Life. 2023. PMID: 38313179 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Tranexamic acid for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 26;10(10):CD015122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015122.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37882229 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of body mass index on size and composition of urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Braz J Urol. 2023 May-Jun;49(3):281-298. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0587. Int Braz J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37115175 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analysis of potential risk factors associated with urolithiasis.Cent Eur J Public Health. 2022 Jun;30(Supplement):S37-S42. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a6812. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35841224
-
Shape and structure controlling of calcium oxalate crystals by a combination of additives in the process of biomineralization.RSC Adv. 2018 Mar 20;8(20):11014-11020. doi: 10.1039/c8ra00661j. eCollection 2018 Mar 16. RSC Adv. 2018. PMID: 35541543 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Johnson CM, Wilson DM, O’Fallon WM, Malek RS, Kurland LT. Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int. 1979;16:624–31. - PubMed
-
- Lieske JC, Pena de la Vega LS, Slezak JM, Bergstralh EJ, Leibson CL, Ho KL, Gettman MT. Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: an update. Kidney Int. 2006;69:760–4. - PubMed
-
- Scales CD, Jr, Curtis LH, Norris RD, Springhart WP, Sur RL, Schulman KA, Preminger GM. Changing gender prevalence of stone disease. J Urol. 2007;177:979–82. - PubMed
-
- Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC. Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005;173:848–57. - PubMed
-
- Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817–23. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
