The impact of nonphysician clinicians: do they improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of health care services?
- PMID: 19880672
- DOI: 10.1177/1077558709346277
The impact of nonphysician clinicians: do they improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of health care services?
Abstract
Health care is changing rapidly. Unacceptable variations in service access and quality of health care and pressures to contain costs have led to the redefinition of professional roles. The roles of nonphysician clinicians (nurses, physician assistants, and pharmacists) have been extended to the medical domain. It is expected that such revision of roles will improve health care effectiveness and efficiency. The evidence suggests that nonphysician clinicians working as substitutes or supplements for physicians in defined areas of care can maintain and often improve the quality of care and outcomes for patients. The effect on health care costs is mixed, with savings dependent on the context of care and specific nature of role revision. The evidence base underpinning these conclusions is strongest for nurses with a marked paucity of research into pharmacists and physician assistants. More robust evaluative studies into role revision are needed, particularly with regard to economic impacts, before definitive conclusions can be drawn.
Comment in
-
The relative value and risks of nonphysician health care providers.JAAPA. 2010 Apr;23(4):50, 52. doi: 10.1097/01720610-201004000-00009. JAAPA. 2010. PMID: 20411639 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Primary care physicians in Israel: self-perception of their role in the healthcare system and policy makers' and patients' perception of them as gatekeepers.Isr Med Assoc J. 2001 Dec;3(12):893-7. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001. PMID: 11794909
-
The cost of rural health services in Papua New Guinea.P N G Med J. 1991 Dec;34(4):276-84. P N G Med J. 1991. PMID: 1799090
-
Emerging opportunities for physician-attorneys in the purchaser-driven health care industry of the 1990s.Leg Med. 1989:239-54. Leg Med. 1989. PMID: 2700009 Review.
-
Nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the intensive care unit: an evidence-based review.Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2888-97. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186ba8c. Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18766097 Review.
-
Health care managers' perspectives on new nursing and midwifery roles: perceived impact on patient care and cost effectiveness.J Nurs Manag. 2009 Jul;17(5):627-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00948.x. J Nurs Manag. 2009. PMID: 19575721
Cited by
-
General practitioner workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review protocol.BMJ Open. 2024 May 21;14(5):e075189. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075189. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38772888 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the cost of NP-led vs. GP-led primary care in British Columbia.Healthc Manage Forum. 2024 Jul;37(4):244-250. doi: 10.1177/08404704241229075. Epub 2024 Jan 30. Healthc Manage Forum. 2024. PMID: 38291669 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: A review of systematic reviews.PLoS One. 2023 Sep 7;18(9):e0290977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290977. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37676878 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"Low-value" glycemic outcomes among older adults with diabetes cared for by primary care nurse practitioners or physicians: A retrospective cohort study.Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Sep;145:104532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104532. Epub 2023 May 22. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023. PMID: 37315453 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
