Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment
- PMID: 19905850
- PMCID: PMC8973232
- DOI: 10.2319/111608-588.1
Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment
Abstract
Objective: To construct a decision-making expert system (ES) for the orthodontic treatment of patients between 11 and 15 years old to determine whether extraction is needed by using artificial neural networks (ANN). Specifically, we will uncover the factors that affect this decision-making process.
Methods: A total of 200 subjects were chosen; among them, 120 were accepted for extraction treatments, and 80 were chosen for nonextraction treatments. For each case, 23 indices were selected. A 23-13-1 Back Propagation (BP) ANN model was constructed, and the data for 180 patients were aggregated to constitute the training set. Data for the other 20 patients were used as the testing set.
Results: When data from the 180 patients that had been trained were tested, the result was 100%, as expected. The untrained data from 20 patients in the testing set were 80% correct (ie, 16 cases were forecasted successfully). In the meantime, the relative contributions of the 23 input indices to the final output index (extraction/nonextraction) were calculated. "Anterior teeth uncovered by incompetent lips" and "IMPA (L1-MP)" were the two indices that gave the biggest contributions sequentially; the index of FMA (FH-MP) gave the smallest contribution.
Conclusions: (1) The constructed artificial neural network in this study was effective, with 80% accuracy, in determining whether extraction or nonextraction treatment was best for malocclusion patients between 11 and 15 years old; (2) when the clinician is predicting whether an orthodontic treatment requires extraction, the indices "anterior teeth uncovered by incompetent lips" and "IMPA (L1-MP)" should be taken into consideration first.
Similar articles
-
Computational formulation of orthodontic tooth-extraction decisions. Part I: to extract or not to extract.Angle Orthod. 2009 Sep;79(5):885-91. doi: 10.2319/081908-436.1. Angle Orthod. 2009. PMID: 19705936
-
New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jan;149(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.030. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016. PMID: 26718386
-
Mandibular incisor extraction therapy.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Feb;105(2):107-16. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70106-7. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994. PMID: 8311032
-
Extraction treatment, part 1: the extraction vs. nonextraction debate.J Clin Orthod. 2014 Dec;48(12):753-60. J Clin Orthod. 2014. PMID: 25708110 Review. No abstract available.
-
[The decision to extract in orthodontics].Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 1995;50(2):40-52. Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 1995. PMID: 7480930 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence in Cleft Lip and Palate: An In-Depth Analysis from Diagnosis to Treatment, a Comprehensive Review.Children (Basel). 2024 Jan 23;11(2):140. doi: 10.3390/children11020140. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38397252 Free PMC article. Review.
-
AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning-A Comprehensive Review.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 7;13(2):344. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020344. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38256478 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current Progress and Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Dentistry-A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 28;12(23):7378. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237378. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38068430 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Facial profile evaluation and prediction of skeletal class II patients during camouflage extraction treatment: a pilot study.Head Face Med. 2023 Dec 4;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13005-023-00397-8. Head Face Med. 2023. PMID: 38044428 Free PMC article.
-
Orthodontic Implementation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Some Linear Dental Arch Measurements and Preventing Anterior Segment Malocclusion: A Prospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 9;59(11):1973. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111973. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 38004022 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fukushima K. Neural network model for selective attention in visual pattern recognition and associative recall. Applied Optics. 1987;26:4985–4992. - PubMed
-
- Yamamoto Y, Nikiforuk P. N. A new supervised learning algorithm for multilayered and interconnected neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 2000;11:36–46. - PubMed
-
- Su M. C, Chang H. T. A new model of self-organizing neural networks and its application in data projection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 2001;12:153–158. - PubMed
-
- Lux C. J, Stellzig A, Volz D, et al. A neural network approach to the analysis and classification of human craniofacial growth. Growth Dev Aging. 1998;62:95–106. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
