Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
- PMID: 19920272
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008
Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
Erratum in
- Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 2;152(3):199-200
- Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):688
Abstract
Description: Update of the 2002 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation statement on screening for breast cancer in the general population.
Methods: The USPSTF examined the evidence on the efficacy of 5 screening modalities in reducing mortality from breast cancer: film mammography, clinical breast examination, breast self-examination, digital mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging in order to update the 2002 recommendation. To accomplish this update, the USPSTF commissioned 2 studies: 1) a targeted systematic evidence review of 6 selected questions relating to benefits and harms of screening, and 2) a decision analysis that used population modeling techniques to compare the expected health outcomes and resource requirements of starting and ending mammography screening at different ages and using annual versus biennial screening intervals.
Recommendations: The USPSTF recommends against routine screening mammography in women aged 40 to 49 years. The decision to start regular, biennial screening mammography before the age of 50 years should be an individual one and take into account patient context, including the patient's values regarding specific benefits and harms. (Grade C recommendation) The USPSTF recommends biennial screening mammography for women between the ages of 50 and 74 years. (Grade B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the additional benefits and harms of screening mammography in women 75 years or older. (I statement) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the additional benefits and harms of clinical breast examination beyond screening mammography in women 40 years or older. (I statement) The USPSTF recommends against clinicians teaching women how to perform breast self-examination. (Grade D recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess additional benefits and harms of either digital mammography or magnetic resonance imaging instead of film mammography as screening modalities for breast cancer. (I statement).
Comment in
-
Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):541; author reply 543-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00204. Epub 2010 Feb 15. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157098 No abstract available.
-
Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):542; author reply 543-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00206. Epub 2010 Feb 15. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157100 No abstract available.
-
Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):540-1; author reply 543-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00203. Epub 2010 Feb 15. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157101 No abstract available.
-
Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):540; author reply 543-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00202. Epub 2010 Feb 15. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157102 No abstract available.
-
Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):539-40; author reply 543-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00201. Epub 2010 Feb 15. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157104 No abstract available.
-
Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):541-2; author reply 543-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00205. Epub 2010 Feb 15. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157105 No abstract available.
-
Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):542-3; author reply 543-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00207. Epub 2010 Feb 15. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157107 No abstract available.
-
Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):539; author reply 543-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00200. Epub 2010 Feb 15. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157108 No abstract available.
-
The background review for the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):537-8; author reply 538-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00197. Epub 2010 Feb 15. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20157111 No abstract available.
-
Screening for breast cancer in women with CKD stages 4 to 5.Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Nov;56(5):820-2. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 Jun 3. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010. PMID: 20605300 No abstract available.
-
Mammographic screening for breast cancer: when and how frequent?Natl Med J India. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):152-3. Natl Med J India. 2010. PMID: 20949718 No abstract available.
-
Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 16;157(8):597; author reply 597-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-8-201210160-00019. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 23070497 No abstract available.
-
Does screening for breast cancer with five screening modalities in average-risk women reduce mortality from breast cancer?J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1214-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.010. J Am Coll Surg. 2013. PMID: 23683777 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):I44. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19920254 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26757170
-
Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jun 19;156(12):880-91, W312. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22711081
-
United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W112-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5609. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011. PMID: 21257850
-
Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):727-37, W237-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19920273 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preventive health care, 2001 update: should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer?CMAJ. 2001 Jun 26;164(13):1837-46. CMAJ. 2001. PMID: 11450279 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Survivorship care plans and adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines among cancer survivors in a national sample.Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 18;32(12):798. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08986-2. Support Care Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39551914 Free PMC article.
-
TECRR: a benchmark dataset of radiological reports for BI-RADS classification with machine learning, deep learning, and large language model baselines.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02717-7. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024. PMID: 39444035 Free PMC article.
-
Recognition and comprehension of breast awareness among hospital staff: a questionnaire survey using the explanatory leaflet in Japan.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03373-9. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 39334023 Free PMC article.
-
Breast Cancer Screening Interval: Effect on Rate of Late-Stage Disease at Diagnosis and Overall Survival.J Clin Oncol. 2024 Nov 10;42(32):3837-3846. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00285. Epub 2024 Aug 21. J Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39167740
-
Evaluation of large language models in breast cancer clinical scenarios: a comparative analysis based on ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Claude2.Int J Surg. 2024 Apr 1;110(4):1941-1950. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001066. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38668655 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical