Variations in referral patterns to high-volume centers for pancreatic cancer
- PMID: 19959040
- PMCID: PMC4036485
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.011
Variations in referral patterns to high-volume centers for pancreatic cancer
Abstract
Background: Multiple reports have demonstrated pancreatic cancer patients undergoing surgery have superior outcomes at high-volume hospitals. This study noted trends in access to high-volume centers for pancreatic resection and identified gaps in improving access.
Study design: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS 2000 to 2005) linked to the Area Resource File (ARF). Inclusion criteria were patients with primary diagnosis of pancreatic cancer who received pancreatic resection. The primary outcomes variable was treatment at high-volume hospitals (average annual case volume greater than 20). Independent variables included age, gender, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, insurance status, calendar year, and region, obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample; community poverty level and density of all physicians, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists were data obtained from the Area Resource File.
Results: A total of 8,370 patients were identified. A minority (38.51%) were referred to high-volume hospitals. A significant increase in overall referral and odds of referral to a high-volume center was observed over time (22.2% in 2000 to 44.4% in 2005). Patients referred to high-volume centers were younger (61.9 versus 63.2 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be Caucasian (81.7% versus 73.6%, p < 0.001). Patients greater than 85 years old, African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians were less likely to be referred, relative to their younger, Caucasian counterparts (p < 0.01). The overall trend toward improved referral over time was driven by improved referral among Caucasians. In multivariate analysis, access to high-volume centers was associated with calendar year, patient age, and race. In addition, increase in density of gastroenterologists or radiation oncologists in the population was also associated with higher likelihood of referral.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that less than half of pancreatic cancer patients are being referred to high-volume centers. Unlike referral in Caucasians, improvement in referral for minorities has not occurred.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Variations in referral patterns for hypophysectomies among pediatric patients with sellar and parasellar tumors.Childs Nerv Syst. 2010 Mar;26(3):305-11. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-1014-4. Epub 2009 Nov 10. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010. PMID: 19902221
-
ACA Medicaid expansion reduced disparities in use of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery.Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1785-1793. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.05.033. Epub 2021 Jul 22. Surgery. 2021. PMID: 34303545
-
Trends and disparities in regionalization of pancreatic resection.J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Oct;11(10):1242-51; discussion 1251-2. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0245-5. Epub 2007 Aug 13. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007. PMID: 17694419
-
What is the effect of age on pancreatic resection?Adv Surg. 2009;43:233-49. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2009.02.004. Adv Surg. 2009. PMID: 19845182 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does the Volume-Outcome Association in Pancreas Cancer Surgery Justify Regionalization of Care? A Review of Current Controversies.Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb;29(2):1257-1268. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10765-w. Epub 2021 Sep 14. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34522998 Review.
Cited by
-
Overall Volume of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Positively Impacts Gastric Cancer Outcomes at Centers with Low Gastrectomy Volume.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):5293-5303. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15381-y. Epub 2024 May 22. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38777899
-
Regionalization of pancreatic surgery in California: Benefits for preventing postoperative deaths and reducing healthcare costs.Surg Open Sci. 2023 Nov 20;16:198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.11.004. eCollection 2023 Dec. Surg Open Sci. 2023. PMID: 38076574 Free PMC article.
-
Association between Rural Residence and Processes of Care in Pancreatic Cancer Treatment.J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct;27(10):2155-2165. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05764-z. Epub 2023 Aug 8. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 37553515 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Cancer Care Regionalization on Patient Volume.Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;30(4):2331-2338. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13029-3. Epub 2022 Dec 29. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36581726
-
Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy at a resource-poor, low-volume center in Trinidad and Tobago.World J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 24;13(9):738-747. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i9.738. World J Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36212600 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. - PubMed
-
- Baxter NN, Whitson BA, Tuttle TM. Trends in the treatment and outcome of pancreatic cancer in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1320–1326. - PubMed
-
- Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–1751. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
