Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism
- PMID: 19966341
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906598
Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism
Abstract
Background: The direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has a predictable anticoagulant effect and may be an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients who have acute venous thromboembolism.
Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving patients with acute venous thromboembolism who were initially given parenteral anticoagulation therapy for a median of 9 days (interquartile range, 8 to 11), we compared oral dabigatran, administered at a dose of 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin that was dose-adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. The primary outcome was the 6-month incidence of recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and related deaths. Safety end points included bleeding events, acute coronary syndromes, other adverse events, and results of liver-function tests.
Results: A total of 30 of the 1274 patients randomly assigned to receive dabigatran (2.4%), as compared with 27 of the 1265 patients randomly assigned to warfarin (2.1%), had recurrent venous thromboembolism; the difference in risk was 0.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 1.5; P<0.001 for the prespecified noninferiority margin). The hazard ratio with dabigatran was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.84). Major bleeding episodes occurred in 20 patients assigned to dabigatran (1.6%) and in 24 patients assigned to warfarin (1.9%) (hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.48), and episodes of any bleeding were observed in 205 patients assigned to dabigatran (16.1%) and 277 patients assigned to warfarin (21.9%; hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.85). The numbers of deaths, acute coronary syndromes, and abnormal liver-function tests were similar in the two groups. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 9.0% of patients assigned to dabigatran and in 6.8% of patients assigned to warfarin (P=0.05).
Conclusions: For the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, a fixed dose of dabigatran is as effective as warfarin, has a safety profile that is similar to that of warfarin, and does not require laboratory monitoring. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00291330.)
Copyright 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Dabigatran versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism.N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):1050; author reply 1050-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1000696. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20237354 No abstract available.
-
Dabigatran versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism.N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):1050; author reply 1050-1. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20301800 No abstract available.
-
Dabigatran was noninferior to warfarin for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Apr 20;152(8):JC4-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-02007. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20404376 No abstract available.
-
Review of an Article: Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (2009). Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar A, et al., N Engl J Med 361;2342-2352.J Vasc Nurs. 2010 Jun;28(2):84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2010.03.002. J Vasc Nurs. 2010. PMID: 20494300 No abstract available.
-
Dabigatran etexilate: advances in anticoagulation therapy.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;8(6):771-4. doi: 10.1586/erc.10.67. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010. PMID: 20528634
Similar articles
-
Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with dabigatran or warfarin and pooled analysis.Circulation. 2014 Feb 18;129(7):764-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004450. Epub 2013 Dec 16. Circulation. 2014. PMID: 24344086 Clinical Trial.
-
Extended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism.N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):709-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113697. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23425163 Clinical Trial.
-
Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 10;369(15):1406-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306638. Epub 2013 Aug 31. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23991658 Clinical Trial.
-
Dabigatran etexilate versus warfarin as the oral anticoagulant of choice? A review of clinical data.Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Feb;129(2):185-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Oct 12. Pharmacol Ther. 2011. PMID: 20920530 Review.
-
Dabigatran etexilate in venous thromboembolism.Drugs Today (Barc). 2009 Oct;45(10):715-24. Drugs Today (Barc). 2009. PMID: 20069135 Review.
Cited by
-
Breaking boundaries: exploring recent advances in anticoagulation and thrombosis management: a comprehensive review.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 30;86(11):6585-6597. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002589. eCollection 2024 Nov. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39525737 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Forced randomization: the what, why, and how.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02340-0. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024. PMID: 39379810 Free PMC article.
-
Anticoagulation for cavernous sinus thrombosis: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep 23. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08992-4. Online ahead of print. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 39312001 Review.
-
Guidelines on deep vein thrombosis of the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery.J Vasc Bras. 2024 Sep 3;23:e20230107. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202301072. eCollection 2024. J Vasc Bras. 2024. PMID: 39286300 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism using Real-World Data: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Nov;24(6):823-839. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00677-x. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024. PMID: 39254826
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical