Comorbidity affects the relationship between glycemic control and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes: a cohort study
- PMID: 20008761
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00005
Comorbidity affects the relationship between glycemic control and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes: a cohort study
Abstract
Background: Recent studies have shown mixed results regarding the effectiveness of intensive glucose-lowering therapy in reducing risk for cardiovascular events.
Objective: To determine whether attaining hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) targets of 6.5% or less or 7.0% or less for glycemic control at baseline provides differential benefits for patients with high versus low-to-moderate levels of comorbidity.
Design: 5-year longitudinal observational study of patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were categorized into high and low-to-moderate comorbidity subgroups by using the Total Illness Burden Index (TIBI), a validated patient-reported measure of comorbidity.
Setting: 101 diabetes outpatient clinics and 103 general practitioners' clinics in Italy.
Patients: 2613 (83%) of 3074 patients with type 2 diabetes, sampled randomly from diabetes outpatient clinic rosters and recruited consecutively from general practitioners' clinics, who completed the baseline questionnaire.
Measurements: TIBI score, total mortality, and incident cardiovascular events. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted for age and sex.
Results: Attaining an HbA(1c) level of 6.5% or less at baseline was associated with lower 5-year incidence of cardiovascular events in the low-to-moderate comorbidity subgroup (adjusted HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.85]; P = 0.005) but not in the high comorbidity subgroup (adjusted HR, 0.92 [CI, 0.68 to 1.25]; P = 0.61; P for subgroup by HbA(1c) interaction = 0.048). Similarly, attaining a baseline HbA(1c) level of 7.0% predicted fewer cardiovascular events in the low-to-moderate comorbidity subgroup (adjusted HR, 0.61 (CI, 0.44 to 0.83; P = 0.001) but not in the high comorbidity subgroup (adjusted HR, 0.88 [CI, 0.66 to 1.17]; P = 0.38; P for subgroup by HbA(1c) interaction = 0.093).
Limitations: The observational nature of the study does not allow causal inference. The length of the data collection period was limited. Information on clinical management was not available.
Conclusion: Patients with the high levels of comorbidity common in type 2 diabetes may receive diminished cardiovascular benefit from intensive blood glucose control. Comorbidity should be considered when tailoring glucose-lowering therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Primary funding source: Pfizer of Italy.
Comment in
-
The role of glycemia management in the prevention of cardiovascular disease--starting over?Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 15;151(12):888-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00010. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 20008764 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Chronic health problems seem to influence the relationship of blood sugar control and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 15;151(12):I54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 20008745 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comorbidity and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.Arch Intern Med. 2001 May 28;161(10):1295-300. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.10.1295. Arch Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11371257
-
Summaries for patients. Chronic health problems seem to influence the relationship of blood sugar control and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 15;151(12):I54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 20008745 No abstract available.
-
Short-term impact of HbA1c on morbidity and all-cause mortality in people with type 2 diabetes: a Danish population-based observational study.Diabetologia. 2012 Sep;55(9):2361-70. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2614-1. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Diabetologia. 2012. PMID: 22736395
-
Individualizing glycemic targets in type 2 diabetes mellitus: implications of recent clinical trials.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Apr 19;154(8):554-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-8-201104190-00007. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21502652 Review.
-
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15099124 Review.
Cited by
-
A drug mix and dose decision algorithm for individualized type 2 diabetes management.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Sep 17;7(1):254. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01230-5. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 39289474 Free PMC article.
-
Real-World Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiating Treatment with Oral Semaglutide.Diabetes Ther. 2024 Jul;15(7):1547-1559. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01589-4. Epub 2024 May 9. Diabetes Ther. 2024. PMID: 38722496 Free PMC article.
-
Willingness to take less medication for type 2 diabetes among older patients: The Diabetes & Aging Study.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):1985-1994. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18870. Epub 2024 Mar 12. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024. PMID: 38471959
-
Telemedicine interventions in type 2 diabetes management: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 22;14(2):e078100. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078100. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38388501 Free PMC article.
-
Precision subclassification of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Oct 5;3(1):138. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00360-3. Commun Med (Lond). 2023. PMID: 37798471 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous