Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space
- PMID: 20045892
- DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.1.236
Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space
Abstract
This study explored whether functional properties of the hand and tools influence the allocation of spatial attention. In four experiments that used a visual-orienting paradigm with predictable lateral cues, hands or tools were placed near potential target locations. Results showed that targets appearing in the hand's grasping space (i.e., near the palm) and the rake's raking space (i.e., near the prongs) produced faster responses than did targets appearing to the back of the hand, to the back of the rake, or near the forearm. Validity effects were found regardless of condition in all experiments, but they did not interact with the target-in-grasping/raking-space bias. Thus, the topology of the facilitated space around the hand is, in part, defined by the hand's grasping function and can be flexibly extended by functional experience using a tool. These findings are consistent with the operation of bimodal neurons, and this embodied component is incorporated into a neurally based model of spatial attention.
Similar articles
-
Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Feb;32(1):166-77. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.166. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006. PMID: 16478334
-
Grasping actions remap peripersonal space.Neuroreport. 2009 Jul 1;20(10):913-7. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832c0b9b. Neuroreport. 2009. PMID: 19512951
-
Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):819-23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0480-7. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013. PMID: 23722884
-
The representation of space near the body through touch and vision.Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):782-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.010. Epub 2009 Oct 26. Neuropsychologia. 2010. PMID: 19837101 Review.
-
Dynamics of emotional effects on spatial attention in the human visual cortex.Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:67-91. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56004-2. Prog Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 17015075 Review.
Cited by
-
Tool use moves the peri-personal space from the hand to the tip of the tool.Front Psychol. 2023 May 12;14:1142850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1142850. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37251033 Free PMC article.
-
Opposing influences of global and local stimulus-hand proximity on crosstalk interference in dual tasks.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2461-2478. doi: 10.1177/17470218231157548. Epub 2023 Mar 7. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023. PMID: 36765279 Free PMC article.
-
Does hand proximity enhance letter identification?PLoS One. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):e0280991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280991. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36706115 Free PMC article.
-
Does hand position affect orienting when no action is required? An electrophysiological study.Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 6;16:982005. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.982005. eCollection 2022. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 36685236 Free PMC article.
-
Rethinking Vision and Action.Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:59-86. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-021422-043229. Annu Rev Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36652303 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources