Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):71-7.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3200.

Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis

Sylvia J Hysong et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Electronic medical records (EMRs) facilitate abnormal test result communication through "alert" notifications. The aim was to evaluate how primary care providers (PCPs) manage alerts related to critical diagnostic test results on their EMR screens, and compare alert-management strategies of providers with high versus low rates of timely follow-up of results.

Design: 28 PCPs from a large, tertiary care Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) were purposively sampled according to their rates of timely follow-up of alerts, determined in a previous study. Using techniques from cognitive task analysis, participants were interviewed about how and when they manage alerts, focusing on four alert-management features to filter, sort and reduce unnecessary alerts on their EMR screens.

Results: Provider knowledge of alert-management features ranged between 4% and 75%. Almost half (46%) of providers did not use any of these features, and none used more than two. Providers with higher versus lower rates of timely follow-up used the four features similarly, except one (customizing alert notifications). Providers with low rates of timely follow-up tended to manually scan the alert list and process alerts heuristically using their clinical judgment. Additionally, 46% of providers used at least one workaround strategy to manage alerts.

Conclusion: Considerable heterogeneity exists in provider use of alert-management strategies; specific strategies may be associated with lower rates of timely follow-up. Standardization of alert-management strategies including improving provider knowledge of appropriate tools in the EMR to manage alerts could reduce the lack of timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic test results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Alert notification window in CPRS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Validation process and inter-rater agreement flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Poon EG, Haas JS, Louise PA, et al. Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:316–23 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poon EG, Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, et al. “I wish I had seen this test result earlier!”: dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2223–8 - PubMed
    1. Poon EG, Wang SJ, Gandhi TK, et al. Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager. J Biomed Inform 2003;36:80–91 - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Arora H, Vilhjalmsson R, et al. Communication outcomes of critical imaging results in a computerized notification system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:459–66 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wahls TL, Cram PM. The frequency of missed test results and associated treatment delays in a highly computerized health system. BMC Fam Pract 2007;8:32. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types