Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):104-7.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3294.

Unintended errors with EHR-based result management: a case series

Thomas R Yackel  1 , Peter J Embi
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Unintended errors with EHR-based result management: a case series

Thomas R Yackel et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Test result management is an integral aspect of quality clinical care and a crucial part of the ambulatory medicine workflow. Correct and timely communication of results to a provider is the necessary first step in ambulatory result management and has been identified as a weakness in many paper-based systems. While electronic health records (EHRs) hold promise for improving the reliability of result management, the complexities involved make this a challenging task. Experience with test result management is reported, four new categories of result management errors identified are outlined, and solutions developed during a 2-year deployment of a commercial EHR are described. Recommendations for improving test result management with EHRs are then given.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Poon EG, Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, et al. “I wish I had seen this test result earlier!”: dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2223–8 - PubMed
    1. Poon EG, Haas JS, Louise Puopolo A, et al. Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:316–23 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doebbeling BN, Chou AF, Tierney WM. Priorities and strategies for the implementation of integrated informatics and communications technology to improve evidence-based practice. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21(Suppl 2):S50–7 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanna D, Griswold P, Leape LL, et al. Communicating critical test results: safe practice recommendations. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005;31:68–80 - PubMed
    1. Schiff GD. Introduction: communicating critical test results. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005;31:63–5, 61. - PubMed

Publication types