Song practice promotes acute vocal variability at a key stage of sensorimotor learning
- PMID: 20066039
- PMCID: PMC2797613
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008592
Song practice promotes acute vocal variability at a key stage of sensorimotor learning
Abstract
Background: Trial by trial variability during motor learning is a feature encoded by the basal ganglia of both humans and songbirds, and is important for reinforcement of optimal motor patterns, including those that produce speech and birdsong. Given the many parallels between these behaviors, songbirds provide a useful model to investigate neural mechanisms underlying vocal learning. In juvenile and adult male zebra finches, endogenous levels of FoxP2, a molecule critical for language, decrease two hours after morning song onset within area X, part of the basal ganglia-forebrain pathway dedicated to song. In juveniles, experimental 'knockdown' of area X FoxP2 results in abnormally variable song in adulthood. These findings motivated our hypothesis that low FoxP2 levels increase vocal variability, enabling vocal motor exploration in normal birds.
Methodology/principal findings: After two hours in either singing or non-singing conditions (previously shown to produce differential area X FoxP2 levels), phonological and sequential features of the subsequent songs were compared across conditions in the same bird. In line with our prediction, analysis of songs sung by 75 day (75d) birds revealed that syllable structure was more variable and sequence stereotypy was reduced following two hours of continuous practice compared to these features following two hours of non-singing. Similar trends in song were observed in these birds at 65d, despite higher overall within-condition variability at this age.
Conclusions/significance: Together with previous work, these findings point to the importance of behaviorally-driven acute periods during song learning that allow for both refinement and reinforcement of motor patterns. Future work is aimed at testing the observation that not only does vocal practice influence expression of molecular networks, but that these networks then influence subsequent variability in these skills.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Avian Basal Ganglia Are a Source of Rapid Behavioral Variation That Enables Vocal Motor Exploration.J Neurosci. 2018 Nov 7;38(45):9635-9647. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2915-17.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 24. J Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30249800 Free PMC article.
-
Seasonal plasticity of song behavior relies on motor and syntactic variability induced by a basal ganglia-forebrain circuit.Neuroscience. 2017 Sep 17;359:49-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 14. Neuroscience. 2017. PMID: 28712792
-
Expression analysis of the speech-related genes FoxP1 and FoxP2 and their relation to singing behavior in two songbird species.J Exp Biol. 2013 Oct 1;216(Pt 19):3682-92. doi: 10.1242/jeb.085886. J Exp Biol. 2013. PMID: 24006346 Free PMC article.
-
Age and experience affect the recruitment of new neurons to the song system of zebra finches during the sensitive period for song learning: ditto for vocal learning in humans?Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1021:404-9. doi: 10.1196/annals.1308.049. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004. PMID: 15251918 Review.
-
Sound sequences in birdsong: how much do birds really care?Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jan 6;375(1789):20190044. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0044. Epub 2019 Nov 18. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020. PMID: 31735149 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Expression of FoxP2 in the basal ganglia regulates vocal motor sequences in the adult songbird.Nat Commun. 2021 May 11;12(1):2617. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22918-2. Nat Commun. 2021. PMID: 33976169 Free PMC article.
-
Inhibition of miR-128 Enhances Vocal Sequence Organization in Juvenile Songbirds.Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb 25;16:833383. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.833383. eCollection 2022. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35283744 Free PMC article.
-
Wireless battery free fully implantable multimodal recording and neuromodulation tools for songbirds.Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 30;12(1):1968. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22138-8. Nat Commun. 2021. PMID: 33785751 Free PMC article.
-
Evo-devo, deep homology and FoxP2: implications for the evolution of speech and language.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 27;366(1574):2124-40. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0001. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011. PMID: 21690130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does audience affect the structure of warble song in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)?Behav Processes. 2019 Jun;163:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 18. Behav Processes. 2019. PMID: 29054444 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Scharff C, White SA. Genetic components of vocal learning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1016:325–347. - PubMed
-
- Doupe AJ, Kuhl PK. Birdsong and human speech: Common themes and mechanisms. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1999:567–631. - PubMed
-
- Kuhl PK. Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain? Dev Sci. 2007;10:110–120. - PubMed
