Development and implications of a revised Canadian Healthy Eating Index (HEIC-2009)

Public Health Nutr. 2010 Jun;13(6):820-5. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009993120. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose was to update the Healthy Eating Index-C (HEI-C) with Canada's new food guide recommendations (HEIC-2009) and compare scores and ratings among a small sample of grade 6 students.

Design: Updates to the HEI-C were completed with Canada's new food guide recommendations for daily number of servings. HEI-C and HEIC-2009 scores were computed for a small sample (n 405) of grade 6 students utilizing nutrition data that were collected using the Food Behaviour Questionnaire, a validated web-based dietary assessment tool (including a 24 h dietary recall, FFQ, and food and physical activity behavioural questions).

Setting: Data were collected in fifteen schools in the Region of Waterloo District School Board, Ontario, Canada.

Subjects: A total of 405 students (48 % males and 52 % females) from grade 6 classrooms completed the web-based survey.

Results: The index scores revealed that participants scored higher (74.5 v. 69.6, P < 0.001) using the HEIC-2009 compared with the HEI-C, even though both index scores are rated in the 'needs improvement' category (HEIC-2009, 75 %; HEI-C, 71 %). A small group of participants (n 14), who were previously rated (using the HEI-C) in the 'poor' category, were rated in the 'needs improvement' category using the HEIC-2009 (chi2 = 589.647, df = 4, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The HEIC-2009 has the potential to be used as a population-level diet quality index in Canada.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Diet / standards*
  • Diet / statistics & numerical data
  • Diet Surveys
  • Exercise / physiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Internet
  • Male
  • Mental Recall
  • Nutrition Assessment*
  • Nutrition Policy*
  • Ontario
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*