Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;202(2):124-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.052.

Abstract

This systematic review of uterosacral ligament suspension provides a metaanalysis of anatomic outcomes and a summary of subjective outcomes. A successful anatomic outcome was considered present when women had "optimal" or "satisfactory" (pelvic organ prolapse quantification system stage 0 or 1) outcomes. In the anterior, apical, and posterior compartments, the pooled rates for a successful outcome were 81.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.5-94.5%), 98.3% (95% CI, 95.7-100%), and 87.4% (95% CI, 67.5-94.5%). In the anterior compartment, women with preoperative stage 2 prolapse were more likely than those with preoperative stage 3 prolapse to have a successful anatomic outcome (92.4% vs 66.8%; P = .06). Outcomes, with respect to subjective symptoms, were reassuring; however, it was not possible to pool data because of methodologic differences between studies.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Female
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Humans
  • Ligaments / surgery*
  • Middle Aged
  • Reoperation
  • Sacrum
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Uterine Prolapse / surgery*
  • Vagina / surgery*