The importance of "shrinkage" in subgroup analyses
- PMID: 20138396
- PMCID: PMC2875357
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.002
The importance of "shrinkage" in subgroup analyses
Abstract
Study objective: Subgroup analyses examine associations (eg, between treatment and outcome) within subsets of a larger study sample. The traditional approach evaluates the data in each of the subgroups independently. More accurate answers, however, may be expected when the rest of the data are considered in the analysis of each subgroup, provided there are 3 or more subgroups.
Methods: We present a conceptual introduction to subgroup analysis that makes use of all the available data and then illustrate the technique by applying it to a previously published study of pediatric airway management. Using WinBUGS, freely available computer software, we perform an empirical Bayesian analysis of the treatment effect in each of the subgroups. This approach corrects the original subgroup treatment estimates toward a weighted average treatment effect across all subjects.
Results: The revised estimates of the subgroup treatment effects demonstrate markedly less variability than the original estimates. Further, using these estimates will reduce our total expected error in parameter estimation compared with using the original, independent subgroup estimates. Although any particular estimate may be adjusted inappropriately, adopting this strategy will, on average, lead to results that are more accurate.
Conclusion: When multiple subgroups are considered, it is often inadvisable to ignore the rest of the study data. Authors or readers who wish to examine associations within subgroups are encouraged to use techniques that reduce the total expected error.
Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Emergency Physicians.Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
When less is more: using shrinkage to increase accuracy.Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;55(6):553-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.04.010. Ann Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 20494223 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Bayesian models for subgroup analysis in clinical trials.Clin Trials. 2011 Apr;8(2):129-43. doi: 10.1177/1740774510396933. Epub 2011 Jan 31. Clin Trials. 2011. PMID: 21282293
-
Treatment effect heterogeneity for univariate subgroups in clinical trials: Shrinkage, standardization, or else.Biom J. 2016 Jan;58(1):133-53. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201400102. Epub 2015 Oct 20. Biom J. 2016. PMID: 26485117 Free PMC article.
-
Semi-parametric Bayesian regression for subgroup analysis in clinical trials.J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(6):1024-1042. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1572613. Epub 2019 Feb 12. J Biopharm Stat. 2019. PMID: 30747568
-
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(33):1-56. doi: 10.3310/hta5330. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701102 Review.
-
Flexible Bayesian subgroup analysis in early and confirmatory trials.Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Nov;98:106149. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106149. Epub 2020 Sep 15. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020. PMID: 32942055 Review.
Cited by
-
The Application of Genetic Risk Scores in Rheumatic Diseases: A Perspective.Genes (Basel). 2023 Dec 1;14(12):2167. doi: 10.3390/genes14122167. Genes (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38136989 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ICU-free days as a more sensitive primary outcome for clinical trials in critically ill pediatric patients.J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Jul 7;2(4):e12479. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12479. eCollection 2021 Aug. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021. PMID: 34263247 Free PMC article.
-
Subgroup analyses in confirmatory clinical trials: time to be specific about their purposes.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 18;16:20. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0122-6. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 26891992 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hospital determinants of emergency department left without being seen rates.Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):24-32.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Feb 21. Ann Emerg Med. 2011. PMID: 21334761 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gausche M, Lewis RJ, Stratton SJ, et al. Effect of out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation-effect on survival and neurologic outcome: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA. 2000;283:783–790. - PubMed
-
- James W, Stein C. Estimation with quadratic loss. In: Neyman J, editor. Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; Berkeley: University of California Press; 1961. pp. 311–319.
-
- Efron B, Morris C. Stein’s paradox in statistics. Sci Amer. 1977;236:119–127.
-
- Efron B, Morris C. Data analysis using Stein’s estimator and its generalizations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1975;70:311–319.
-
- De Finetti B. The Theory of Probability. Vols. 1 and 2. New York: Wiley; 1974.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
