Direct and buffering effects of social support among gynecologic cancer survivors

Ann Behav Med. 2010 Feb;39(1):79-90. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9160-1.

Abstract

Background: There are few studies of QoL among long-term gynecologic cancer survivors; available data suggest significant sequelae of disease and treatment. Research clarifying circumstances that improve difficult survivorship trajectories is lacking.

Purpose: The present study examines whether social support moderates the relationship between physical functioning and psychological outcomes by testing the stress-buffering hypothesis.

Methods: Participants (N = 260) were gynecologic cancer survivors (cervical, n = 47; endometrial, n = 133; ovarian, n = 69; vulvar, n = 11). Compromised physical health was conceptualized as multidimensional. Social support (SNI, PSS-Fa, PSS-Fr, ISEL) was tested as a buffer of adverse psychological outcomes (IES-R, CES-D).

Results: Results for traumatic stress provided evidence for buffering; whereas social support was of general benefit for depressive symptoms. Effects varied by source and type of support.

Conclusions: These results suggest that circumstances for gynecologic cancer survivors burdened with physical symptoms may be worse for those with fewer support resources, providing needed insight into a common target of psychosocial interventions for cancer survivors.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Depression / etiology*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Genital Neoplasms, Female / complications
  • Genital Neoplasms, Female / physiopathology
  • Genital Neoplasms, Female / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life* / psychology
  • Social Support*
  • Survivors / psychology*
  • Time Factors