Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Mar;58(3):533-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02720.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making

Alexia M Torke et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the degree to which physicians report reliance on patient preferences when making medical decisions for hospitalized patients lacking decisional capacity.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: One academic and two community hospitals in a single metropolitan area.

Participants: Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for hospitalized adults.

Measurements: A self-administered survey addressing physicians' beliefs about ethical principles guiding surrogate decision-making and physicians' recent decision-making experiences.

Results: Overall, 72.6% of physicians identified a standard related to patient preferences as the most important ethical standard for surrogate decision-making (61.2% identified advanced directives and 11.4% substituted judgment). Of the 73.3% of physicians who reported recently making a surrogate decision, 81.8% reported that patient preferences were highly important in decision-making, although only 29.4% reported that patient preference was the most important factor in the decision. Physicians were significantly more likely to base decisions on patient preferences when the patient was in the intensive care unit (odds ratio (OR)=2.92, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.15-7.45) and less likely when the patient was older (OR=0.76 for each decade of age, 95% CI=0.58-0.99). The presence of a living will, prior discussions with the patient, and the physicians' beliefs about ethical guidelines did not significantly predict the physicians' reliance on patient preferences.

Conclusion: Although a majority of physicians identified patient preferences as the most important general ethical guideline for surrogate decision-making, they relied on a variety of factors when making treatment decisions for a patient lacking decisional capacity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors report a conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Elements of Financial/Personal ConflictsAMTRMMSAAGCA
YesNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYesNo
Employment or AffiliationXXXXX
Grants/FundsXXXXX
HonorariaXXXXX
Speaker ForumXXXXX
ConsultantXXXXX
StocksXXXXX
RoyaltiesXXXXX
Expert TestimonyXXXXX
Board MemberXXXXX
PatentsXXXXX
Personal RelationshipXXXXX

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanan A, et al. Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2004;364:1421–1427. - PubMed
    1. Buchanan, Brock . Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
    1. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Proxy decision making for incompetent patients. An ethical and empirical analysis. JAMA. 1992;267:2067–2071. - PubMed
    1. Torke AM, Simmerling M, Siegler M, Kaya D, Alexander GC. Rethinking the ethical framework for surrogate decision making: a qualitative study of physicians. J Clin Ethics. 2008;19:110–119. - PubMed
    1. Perkins HS, Bauer RL, Hazuda HP, Schoolfield JD. Impact of legal liability, family wishes, and other “external factors” on physicians’ life-support decisions. Am J Med. 1990;89:185–194. - PubMed

Publication types