Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making
- PMID: 20158556
- PMCID: PMC3513265
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02720.x
Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the degree to which physicians report reliance on patient preferences when making medical decisions for hospitalized patients lacking decisional capacity.
Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Setting: One academic and two community hospitals in a single metropolitan area.
Participants: Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for hospitalized adults.
Measurements: A self-administered survey addressing physicians' beliefs about ethical principles guiding surrogate decision-making and physicians' recent decision-making experiences.
Results: Overall, 72.6% of physicians identified a standard related to patient preferences as the most important ethical standard for surrogate decision-making (61.2% identified advanced directives and 11.4% substituted judgment). Of the 73.3% of physicians who reported recently making a surrogate decision, 81.8% reported that patient preferences were highly important in decision-making, although only 29.4% reported that patient preference was the most important factor in the decision. Physicians were significantly more likely to base decisions on patient preferences when the patient was in the intensive care unit (odds ratio (OR)=2.92, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.15-7.45) and less likely when the patient was older (OR=0.76 for each decade of age, 95% CI=0.58-0.99). The presence of a living will, prior discussions with the patient, and the physicians' beliefs about ethical guidelines did not significantly predict the physicians' reliance on patient preferences.
Conclusion: Although a majority of physicians identified patient preferences as the most important general ethical guideline for surrogate decision-making, they relied on a variety of factors when making treatment decisions for a patient lacking decisional capacity.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors report a conflict of interest related to this manuscript. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Similar articles
-
How Surrogates Decide: A Secondary Data Analysis of Decision-Making Principles Used by the Surrogates of Hospitalized Older Adults.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1285-1293. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4158-z. Epub 2017 Aug 24. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28840485 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' experience with surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults.J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep;24(9):1023-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1065-y. Epub 2009 Jul 25. J Gen Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19633896 Free PMC article.
-
Patient participation in medical and social decisions in Alzheimer's disease.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Nov;59(11):2045-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03661.x. Epub 2011 Oct 22. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011. PMID: 22092150
-
Patient preferences versus physicians' judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making?Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):163-80. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0023-3. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013. PMID: 23529716 Review.
-
[Advance directives in clinical practice : Living will, healthcare power of attorney and care directive].Z Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;76(5):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s00393-017-0318-0. Z Rheumatol. 2017. PMID: 28477205 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Physicians' experiences and perceptions about withholding and withdrawal life-sustaining treatment in Chiang Mai University Hospital: a cross-sectional study.BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 13;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01511-6. BMC Palliat Care. 2024. PMID: 39138443 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes toward withholding antibiotics from people with dementia lacking decisional capacity: findings from a survey of Canadian stakeholders.BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00689-1. BMC Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 34488722 Free PMC article.
-
[Family's Perception of Proxy Decision Making to Authorize Do Not Resuscitate Order of Elderly Patients in Long Term Care Facility: A Q-Methodological Study].J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Feb;51(1):15-26. doi: 10.4040/jkan.20188. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021. PMID: 33706328 Korean.
-
Variables that influence the medical decision regarding Advance Directives and their impact on end-of-life care.Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019 Oct 10;18:eRW4852. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020RW4852. eCollection 2020. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019. PMID: 31618287 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How Surrogates Decide: A Secondary Data Analysis of Decision-Making Principles Used by the Surrogates of Hospitalized Older Adults.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1285-1293. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4158-z. Epub 2017 Aug 24. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28840485 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanan A, et al. Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2004;364:1421–1427. - PubMed
-
- Buchanan, Brock . Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
-
- Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Proxy decision making for incompetent patients. An ethical and empirical analysis. JAMA. 1992;267:2067–2071. - PubMed
-
- Torke AM, Simmerling M, Siegler M, Kaya D, Alexander GC. Rethinking the ethical framework for surrogate decision making: a qualitative study of physicians. J Clin Ethics. 2008;19:110–119. - PubMed
-
- Perkins HS, Bauer RL, Hazuda HP, Schoolfield JD. Impact of legal liability, family wishes, and other “external factors” on physicians’ life-support decisions. Am J Med. 1990;89:185–194. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
