The ROSE (risk stratification of syncope in the emergency department) study
- PMID: 20170806
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.049
The ROSE (risk stratification of syncope in the emergency department) study
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a clinical decision rule (CDR) to predict 1-month serious outcome and all-cause death in patients presenting with syncope to the emergency department.
Background: Syncope is a common, potentially serious condition accounting for many hospital admissions.
Methods: This was a single center, prospective, observational study of adults presenting to the emergency department with syncope. A CDR was devised from 550 patients in a derivation cohort and tested in a validation cohort of a further 550 patients.
Results: One-month serious outcome or all-cause death occurred in 40 (7.3%) patients in the derivation cohort. Independent predictors were brain natriuretic peptide concentration > or =300 pg/ml (odds ratio [OR]: 7.3), positive fecal occult blood (OR: 13.2), hemoglobin < or =90 g/l (OR: 6.7), oxygen saturation < or =94% (OR: 3.0), and Q-wave on the presenting electrocardiogram (OR: 2.8). One-month serious outcome or all-cause death occurred in 39 (7.1%) patients in the validation cohort. The ROSE (Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department) rule had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.2% and 65.5%, respectively, and a negative predictive value of 98.5%. An elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration alone was a major predictor of serious cardiovascular outcomes (8 of 22 events, 36%) and all-cause deaths (8 of 9 deaths, 89%).
Conclusions: The ROSE rule has excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value in the identification of high-risk patients with syncope. As a component, BNP seems to be a major predictor of serious cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause death. The ROSE rule and BNP measurement might be valuable risk stratification tools in patients with emergency presentations of syncope and should now be subjected to external validation.
Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Initial evaluation of "syncope and collapse" the need for a risk stratification consensus.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):722-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.050. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20170807 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
One-year prognosis after syncope and the failure of the ROSE decision instrument to predict one-year adverse events.Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;58(3):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.021. Epub 2011 Feb 2. Ann Emerg Med. 2011. PMID: 21288597
-
The Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department (ROSE) pilot study: a comparison of existing syncope guidelines.Emerg Med J. 2007 Apr;24(4):270-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.042739. Emerg Med J. 2007. PMID: 17384381 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of brain natriuretic peptide assay as a predictor of short term outcomes in patients presenting with syncope to the emergency department.Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016 Jun;6(3):234-40. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.03.06. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016. PMID: 27280086 Free PMC article.
-
San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict short-term serious outcomes: a systematic review.CMAJ. 2011 Oct 18;183(15):E1116-26. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101326. Epub 2011 Sep 26. CMAJ. 2011. PMID: 21948723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Syncope risk stratification tools vs clinical judgment: an individual patient data meta-analysis.Am J Med. 2014 Nov;127(11):1126.e13-1126.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.022. Epub 2014 May 23. Am J Med. 2014. PMID: 24862309 Review.
Cited by
-
Interhospital variability in hospital admissions for patients with low-risk syncope presenting to the emergency department.Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jun 18;5(7):435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.06.006. eCollection 2024 Jul. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024. PMID: 39119025 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of a Novel Predictive Model for the Early Differentiation of Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Syncope.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Mar 6;17:841-853. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S454521. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 38463438 Free PMC article.
-
A Hybrid Model for 30-Day Syncope Prognosis Prediction in the Emergency Department.J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 20;14(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010004. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 38276219 Free PMC article.
-
Application of five risk stratification tools for syncope in older adults.J Int Med Res. 2024 Jan;52(1):3000605231220894. doi: 10.1177/03000605231220894. J Int Med Res. 2024. PMID: 38190847 Free PMC article.
-
Risk stratification tools for patients with syncope in emergency medical services and emergency departments: a scoping review.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 18;31(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01102-z. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 37723535 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
