Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Apr;183(4):1504-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.014. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

Regional variation in total cost per radical prostatectomy in the healthcare cost and utilization project nationwide inpatient sample database

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Regional variation in total cost per radical prostatectomy in the healthcare cost and utilization project nationwide inpatient sample database

Danil V Makarov et al. J Urol. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical treatment for prostate cancer represents a large national health care expenditure. We determined whether state level variation in the cost of radical prostatectomy exists and whether we could explain this variation by adjusting for covariates associated with cost.

Materials and methods: Using the 2004 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample of 7,978,041 patients we identified 9,917 who were 40 years old or older with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy without cystectomy. We used linear regression to examine state level regional variation in radical prostatectomy costs, controlling for the local area wage index, patient demographics, case mix and hospital characteristics.

Results: The mean +/- SD unadjusted cost was $9,112 +/- $4,434 (range $2,001 to $49,922). The unadjusted mean cost ranged from $12,490 in California to $4,650 in Utah, each significantly different from the mean of $8,903 in the median state, Washington (p <0.0001). After adjusting for all potential confounders total cost was highest in Colorado and lowest in New Jersey, which were significantly different from the median, Washington ($10,750 and $5,899, respectively, vs $8,641, p <0.0001). The model explained 85.9% of the variance with regional variation accounting for the greatest incremental proportion of variance (35.1%) and case mix variables accounting for an incremental 32.3%.

Conclusions: The total cost of radical prostatectomy varies significantly across states. Controlling for known total cost determinants did not completely explain these differences but altered ordinal cost relationships among states. Cost variation suggests inefficiencies in the health care market. Additional studies are needed to determine whether these variations in total cost translate into differences in quality or outcome and how they may be translated into useful policy measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Editorial comment.
    Albertsen PC. Albertsen PC. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1509. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.118. Epub 2010 Feb 20. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20172560 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types