A Bayesian approach to quantifying the effects of mass poultry vaccination upon the spatial and temporal dynamics of H5N1 in Northern Vietnam
- PMID: 20174604
- PMCID: PMC2824746
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000683
A Bayesian approach to quantifying the effects of mass poultry vaccination upon the spatial and temporal dynamics of H5N1 in Northern Vietnam
Erratum in
- PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(3). doi: 10.1371/annotation/bdf0c45a-a656-4980-8bc8-7990255ed1ad
Abstract
Outbreaks of H5N1 in poultry in Vietnam continue to threaten the livelihoods of those reliant on poultry production whilst simultaneously posing a severe public health risk given the high mortality associated with human infection. Authorities have invested significant resources in order to control these outbreaks. Of particular interest is the decision, following a second wave of outbreaks, to move from a "stamping out" approach to the implementation of a nationwide mass vaccination campaign. Outbreaks which occurred around this shift in policy provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the relative effectiveness of these approaches and to help other countries make informed judgements when developing control strategies. Here we use Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) data augmentation techniques to derive the first quantitative estimates of the impact of the vaccination campaign on the spread of outbreaks of H5N1 in northern Vietnam. We find a substantial decrease in the transmissibility of infection between communes following vaccination. This was coupled with a significant increase in the time from infection to detection of the outbreak. Using a cladistic approach we estimated that, according to the posterior mean effect of pruning the reconstructed epidemic tree, two thirds of the outbreaks in 2007 could be attributed to this decrease in the rate of reporting. The net impact of these two effects was a less intense but longer-lasting wave and, whilst not sufficient to prevent the sustained spread of outbreaks, an overall reduction in the likelihood of the transmission of infection between communes. These findings highlight the need for more effectively targeted surveillance in order to help ensure that the effective coverage achieved by mass vaccination is converted into a reduction in the likelihood of outbreaks occurring which is sufficient to control the spread of H5N1 in Vietnam.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
between waves with associated 95% credible intervals (see Text S1).
Similar articles
-
Assessment of national strategies for control of high-pathogenicity avian influenza and low-pathogenicity notifiable avian influenza in poultry, with emphasis on vaccines and vaccination.Rev Sci Tech. 2011 Dec;30(3):839-70. doi: 10.20506/rst.30.3.2081. Rev Sci Tech. 2011. PMID: 22435196
-
A quantitative risk assessment to evaluate the efficacy of mitigation strategies to reduce highly pathogenic avian influenza virus, subtype H5N1 (HPAI H5N1) in the Menoufia governorate, Egypt.BMC Vet Res. 2021 Jun 7;17(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02917-7. BMC Vet Res. 2021. PMID: 34098961 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the transmissibility of H5N1 and the effect of vaccination in Indonesia.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015 Apr;62(2):200-8. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12108. Epub 2013 Jun 4. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015. PMID: 23731554
-
Vaccination of gallinaceous poultry for H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza: current questions and new technology.Virus Res. 2013 Dec 5;178(1):121-32. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Mar 21. Virus Res. 2013. PMID: 23524326 Review.
-
Success factors for avian influenza vaccine use in poultry and potential impact at the wild bird-agricultural interface.Ecohealth. 2014;11(1):94-108. doi: 10.1007/s10393-013-0861-3. Epub 2013 Sep 12. Ecohealth. 2014. PMID: 24026475 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the vaccination efficacy against H5N1 in domestic poultry in the Red River Delta in Vietnam.Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Apr;141(4):776-88. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812001628. Epub 2012 Jul 30. Epidemiol Infect. 2013. PMID: 22846369 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for avian influenza A (H5N1) risk management in live bird market networks.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 28;110(22):9177-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220815110. Epub 2013 May 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013. PMID: 23650388 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the implementation of rest days in live bird markets on the dynamics of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza.J R Soc Interface. 2011 Aug 7;8(61):1079-89. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0510. Epub 2010 Dec 3. J R Soc Interface. 2011. PMID: 21131332 Free PMC article.
-
Role of social networks in shaping disease transmission during a community outbreak of 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):2825-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008895108. Epub 2011 Jan 31. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21282645 Free PMC article.
-
Transmission Dynamics of African Swine Fever Virus, South Korea, 2019.Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;27(7):1909-1918. doi: 10.3201/eid2707.204230. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 34152953 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nguyen T. The 2003–2004 H5N1 avian influenza outbreak in Vietnam. In: Knobler SL, Mack A, Mahmoud A, Lemon SM, editors. The Threat of Pandemic Influenza: Are we ready? Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005. pp. 130–140. - PubMed
-
- Agrifood Consulting International. The Impact of Avian Influenza on Poultry Sector Restructuring and its Socio-Economic Effects. 2006. 74. Report submitted to FAO.
-
- Cristalli A, Capua I. Practical problems in controlling H5N1 high pathogenicity avian influenza at village level in Vietnam and introduction of biosecurity measures. Avian Diseases. 2007;51:461–462. - PubMed
-
- Tung D. Smallholder poultry productionin Vietnam: Marketing characteristics and strategies. 2005. National Institute of Animal Husbandry, Vietnam.
-
- Pfeiffer DU, Minh PQ, Martin V, Epprecht M, Otte MJ. An analysis of the spatial and temporal patterns of highly pathogenic avian influenza occurrence in Vietnam using national surveillance data. Veterinary Journal. 2007;174:302–309. - PubMed
