Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial
- PMID: 20177029
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0839
Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial
Abstract
Purpose: We investigated the respective contribution (in terms of cancer yield and stage at diagnosis) of clinical breast examination (CBE), mammography, ultrasound, and quality-assured breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), used alone or in different combination, for screening women at elevated risk for breast cancer.
Methods: Prospective multicenter observational cohort study. Six hundred eighty-seven asymptomatic women at elevated familial risk (> or = 20% lifetime) underwent 1,679 annual screening rounds consisting of CBE, mammography, ultrasound, and MRI, read independently and in different combinations. In a subgroup of 371 women, additional half-yearly ultrasound and CBE was performed more than 869 screening rounds. Mean and median follow-up was 29.18 and 29.09 months.
Results: Twenty-seven women were diagnosed with breast cancer: 11 ductal carcinoma in situ (41%) and 16 invasive cancers (59%). Three (11%) of 27 were node positive. All cancers were detected during annual screening; no interval cancer occurred; no cancer was identified during half-yearly ultrasound. The cancer yield of ultrasound (6.0 of 1,000) and mammography (5.4 of 1,000) was equivalent; it increased nonsignificantly (7.7 of 1,000) if both methods were combined. Cancer yield achieved by MRI alone (14.9 of 1,000) was significantly higher; it was not significantly improved by adding mammography (MRI plus mammography: 16.0 of 1,000) and did not change by adding ultrasound (MRI plus ultrasound: 14.9 of 1,000). Positive predictive value was 39% for mammography, 36% for ultrasound, and 48% for MRI.
Conclusion: In women at elevated familial risk, quality-assured MRI screening shifts the distribution of screen-detected breast cancers toward the preinvasive stage. In women undergoing quality-assured MRI annually, neither mammography, nor annual or half-yearly ultrasound or CBE will add to the cancer yield achieved by MRI alone.
Comment in
-
Early diagnosis of hereditary breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging: what is realistic?J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1441-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3467. Epub 2010 Feb 22. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20177020 No abstract available.
-
Screening of women at high familial risk of breast cancer.Womens Health (Lond). 2010 Jul;6(4):509-10. doi: 10.2217/whe.10.35. Womens Health (Lond). 2010. PMID: 20597614
-
Screening in women at elevated risk for breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 20;28(30):e607-8; author reply e609-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.8034. Epub 2010 Sep 20. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20855835 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8469-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.4960. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16293877 Clinical Trial.
-
[The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period].Rofo. 2005 Jun;177(6):818-27. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858203. Rofo. 2005. PMID: 15902631 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Oct 15;13(20):6144-52. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1270. Clin Cancer Res. 2007. PMID: 17947480
-
Screening for hereditary breast cancer.Semin Oncol. 2007 Oct;34(5):392-400. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.07.002. Semin Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17920893 Review.
-
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jun;19(3):163-9. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e31818bc994. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008. PMID: 18941396 Review.
Cited by
-
Case report: Possible role of low-dose PEM for avoiding unneeded procedures associated with false-positive or equivocal breast MRI results.Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 18;14:1405404. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1405404. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39091907 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of MRI in Breast Cancer and Breast Conservation Therapy.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 1;16(11):2122. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112122. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38893241 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The paradox of MRI for breast cancer screening: high-risk and dense breasts-available evidence and current practice.Insights Imaging. 2024 Mar 27;15(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01653-4. Insights Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38536530 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Utilizing large language models in breast cancer management: systematic review.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 19;150(3):140. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05678-6. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38504034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Breast Cancer Detection Using a Low-Dose Positron Emission Digital Mammography System.Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Mar;6(2):e230020. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230020. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38334470 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
