Love hurts: an fMRI study
- PMID: 20188182
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.047
Love hurts: an fMRI study
Abstract
Being in a close relationship is essential to human existence. Such closeness can be described as including other in the self and be underpinned on social attachment system, which evolved from a redirection of nociceptive mechanisms. To what extent does imagining a loved-one differs from imagining an unfamiliar individual being in painful situations? In this functional MRI study, participants were exposed to animated stimuli depicting hands or feet in painful and non-painful situations, and instructed to imagine these scenarios from three different perspectives: self, loved-one and stranger after being primed with their respective photographs. In line with previous studies, the three perspectives were associated with activation of the neural network involved in pain processing. Specifically, adopting the perspective of a loved-one increased activity in the anterior cingulate cortex and insula, whereas imagining a stranger induced a signal increase in the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) and superior frontal gyrus. The closer the participants' relationships were with their partner, the greater the deactivation in the right TPJ. A negative effective connectivity between the right TPJ and the insula, and a positive one with the superior frontal gyrus were found when participants imagined the perspective of a stranger. These results demonstrate that intimacy affects the bottom-up information processing involved in empathy, as indicated by greater overlap between neural representations of the self and the other.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain.Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(5):752-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.015. Epub 2005 Sep 6. Neuropsychologia. 2006. PMID: 16140345
-
Who caused the pain? An fMRI investigation of empathy and intentionality in children.Neuropsychologia. 2008 Sep;46(11):2607-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.026. Epub 2008 Jun 3. Neuropsychologia. 2008. PMID: 18573266
-
How do we empathize with someone who is not like us? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Feb;22(2):362-76. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21186. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 19199417
-
Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain.Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2492-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Oct 12. Neuroimage. 2011. PMID: 20946964 Review.
-
[Neural basis of maternal behavior].Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2013;115(6):630-4. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2013. PMID: 23944121 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Neural activity patterns evoked by a spouse's incongruent emotional reactions when recalling marriage-relevant experiences.Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Oct;36(10):4164-83. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22909. Epub 2015 Jul 28. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015. PMID: 26219536 Free PMC article.
-
Racial bias in neural empathic responses to pain.PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e84001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084001. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24376780 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting Empathy From Resting State Brain Connectivity: A Multivariate Approach.Front Integr Neurosci. 2020 Feb 14;14:3. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2020.00003. eCollection 2020. Front Integr Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32116582 Free PMC article.
-
The role of self-representation in emotional contagion.Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 May 9;18:1361368. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1361368. eCollection 2024. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38784524 Free PMC article.
-
Interpersonal touch suppresses visual processing of aversive stimuli.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 8;9:164. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00164. eCollection 2015. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 25904856 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
