Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;210(3):299-305.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.11.008.

Verified centers, nonverified centers, or other facilities: a national analysis of burn patient treatment location

David Zonies  1 , Christopher Mack, Bradley Kramer, Frederick Rivara, Matthew Klein
Affiliations

Verified centers, nonverified centers, or other facilities: a national analysis of burn patient treatment location

David Zonies et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Although comprehensive burn care requires significant resources, patients may be treated at verified burn centers, nonverified burn centers, or other facilities due to a variety of factors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between patient and injury characteristics and treatment location using a national database.

Study design: We performed an analysis of all burn patients admitted to United States hospitals participating in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project over 2 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient and injury factors associated with the likelihood of treatment at designated burn care facilities. Definitive care facilities were categorized as American Burn Association-verified centers, nonverified burn centers, or other facilities.

Results: During the 2 years of the study, 29,971 burn patients were treated in 1,376 hospitals located in 19 participating states. A total of 6,712 (22%) patients were treated at verified centers, with 26% and 52% treated at nonverified or other facilities, respectively. Patients treated at verified centers were younger than those treated at nonverified or other facilities (33.1 years versus 33.7 years versus 41.9 years; p < 0.001) and had a higher rate of inhalation injury (3.4% versus 3.2% versus 2.2%; p < 0.001). Independent factors associated with treatment at verified centers include burns to the head or neck (relative risk [RR], 2.4; CI, 2.1 to 2.7), hand (RR, 1.8; CI, 1.6 to 1.9), electrical injury (RR, 1.4; CI, 1.2 to 1.7), and fewer comorbidities (RR, 0.55; CI, 0.5 to 0.6).

Conclusions: More than two-thirds of significantly burned patients are treated at nonverified burn centers in the United States. Many patients meeting American Burn Association criteria for transfer to a burn center are being treated at nonburn center facilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Type of treating facility by the proportion of total burn surface area burned.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Type of treating facility for patients meeting ABA burn center transfer criteria.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Type of treating facility by patient's payer status.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Association AB. Burn Center Verification. [1 March 2008]. 2008. 2008. Available at: http://www.ameriburn.org/verification_verifiedcenters.php.
    1. Association AB. Burn Center Referal Criteria. [15 December 2008]. 2008. 2008. Available at: www.ameriburn.org.
    1. Klein MB, Mack CD, Kramer CB, et al. Influence of injury characteristics and payer status on burn treatment location in Washington state. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29:435–440. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathens AB, Maier RV, Copass MK, et al. Payer status: the unspoken triage criterion. J Trauma. 2001;50:776–783. - PubMed
    1. American College of Surgeons. Committee on T Resources for optimal care of the injured patient 2006. Chicago, IL.: American College of Surgeons; 2006.

Publication types